Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jan;51(1):37-49.
doi: 10.5946/ce.2017.141. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

Colorectal Cancer Screening-Who, How, and When?

Affiliations
Review

Colorectal Cancer Screening-Who, How, and When?

Roisin Bevan et al. Clin Endosc. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide. It is amenable to screening as it occurs in premalignant, latent, early, and curable stages. PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and national and international CRC screening guidelines were searched for CRC screening methods, populations, and timing. CRC screening can use direct or indirect tests, delivered opportunistically or via organized programs. Most CRCs are diagnosed after 60 years of age; most screening programs apply to individuals 50-75 years of age. Screening may reduce disease-specific mortality by detecting CRC in earlier stages, and CRC incidence by detecting premalignant polyps, which can subsequently be removed. In randomized controlled trials (RCTs) guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBt) was found to reduce CRC mortality by 13%-33%. Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) has no RCT data comparing it to no screening, but is superior to gFOBt. Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) trials demonstrated an 18% reduction in CRC incidence and a 28% reduction in CRC mortality. Currently, RCT evidence for colonoscopy screening is scarce. Although not yet corroborated by RCTs, it is likely that colonoscopy is the best screening modality for an individual. From a population perspective, organized programs are superior to opportunistic screening. However, no nation can offer organized population-wide colonoscopy screening. Thus, organized programs using cheaper modalities, such as FS/FIT, can be tailored to budget and capacity.

Keywords: Colonoscopy; Colorectal neoplasms; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest:The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer . Lyon: IARC; c2012. GLOBOCAN 2012: estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012 [Internet] [cited 2017 Sep 5]. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx.
    1. Center MM, Jemal A, Smith RA, Ward E. Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:366–378. - PubMed
    1. Burt RW, Barthel JS, Dunn KB, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Colorectal cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8:8–61. - PubMed
    1. Cancer Research UK . London: Cancer Research UK; c2015. Bowel cancer statistics [Internet] [cited 2017 Sep 5]. Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/st....
    1. Cancer Research UK . London: Cancer Research UK; c2015. Bowel cancer incidence statistics [Internet] [cited 2017 Sep 5]. Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/st....

LinkOut - more resources