Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: An NIMH-sponsored workshop
- PMID: 29398575
- PMCID: PMC5997279
- DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.008
Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: An NIMH-sponsored workshop
Abstract
Background: Neuropsychiatric disorders are a leading source of disability and require novel treatments that target mechanisms of disease. As such disorders are thought to result from aberrant neuronal circuit activity, neuromodulation approaches are of increasing interest given their potential for manipulating circuits directly. Low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) with direct currents (transcranial direct current stimulation, tDCS) or alternating currents (transcranial alternating current stimulation, tACS) represent novel, safe, well-tolerated, and relatively inexpensive putative treatment modalities.
Objective: This report seeks to promote the science, technology and effective clinical applications of these modalities, identify research challenges, and suggest approaches for addressing these needs in order to achieve rigorous, reproducible findings that can advance clinical treatment.
Methods: The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) convened a workshop in September 2016 that brought together experts in basic and human neuroscience, electrical stimulation biophysics and devices, and clinical trial methods to examine the physiological mechanisms underlying tDCS/tACS, technologies and technical strategies for optimizing stimulation protocols, and the state of the science with respect to therapeutic applications and trial designs.
Results: Advances in understanding mechanisms, methodological and technological improvements (e.g., electronics, computational models to facilitate proper dosing), and improved clinical trial designs are poised to advance rigorous, reproducible therapeutic applications of these techniques. A number of challenges were identified and meeting participants made recommendations made to address them.
Conclusions: These recommendations align with requirements in NIMH funding opportunity announcements to, among other needs, define dosimetry, demonstrate dose/response relationships, implement rigorous blinded trial designs, employ computational modeling, and demonstrate target engagement when testing stimulation-based interventions for the treatment of mental disorders.
Keywords: Neuromodulation; Reproducibility; Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS); Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES).
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Lucas Parra and Marom Bikson are co-founders of Soterix Medical Inc. and co-inventors in patents held by the City College of New York (CCNY). The goal of these efforts is to make High-Definition tDCS broadly available. Flavio Frohlich is the founder, majority owner, and chief scientific officer of Pulvinar Neuro LLC, which markets devices for tDCS/tACS research. The University of North Carolina has filed several patents based on his inventions. Andre Russowsky Brunoni receives a CAPES-Humboldt research fellowship for experienced researchers. Colleen Loo received tDCS equipment from Soterix for conducting independent, investigator-initiated clinical trials. Zhi-De Deng and Sarah H. Lisanby are co-inventors on TMS technology, unrelated to the topics presented here. Drs. Charvet, Clark, Cohen, Dmochowski, Edwards, Kappen-man, Lim, Mantovani, McMullen, Richardson, Rumsey, Sehatpour, Sommers, Wassermann and Woods, Ms. Unal, and Ms. Pearson report no conflicts.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Updated Technique for Reliable, Easy, and Tolerated Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Including Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.J Vis Exp. 2020 Jan 3;(155). doi: 10.3791/59204. J Vis Exp. 2020. PMID: 31957745
-
A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Feb;127(2):1031-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Nov 22. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016. PMID: 26652115 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Feasibility of Interferential and Pulsed Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Neuromodulation at the Human Scale.Neuromodulation. 2021 Jul;24(5):843-853. doi: 10.1111/ner.13137. Epub 2020 Mar 8. Neuromodulation. 2021. PMID: 32147953
-
Guidelines for TMS/tES clinical services and research through the COVID-19 pandemic.Brain Stimul. 2020 Jul-Aug;13(4):1124-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 May 12. Brain Stimul. 2020. PMID: 32413554 Free PMC article.
-
Basic and functional effects of transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES)-An introduction.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Feb;85:81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.06.015. Epub 2017 Jul 6. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018. PMID: 28688701 Review.
Cited by
-
Blinding in tDCS Studies: Correct End-of-Study Guess Does Not Moderate the Effects on Associative and Working Memory.Brain Sci. 2021 Dec 31;12(1):58. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12010058. Brain Sci. 2021. PMID: 35053802 Free PMC article.
-
Probing the Link Between Perception and Oscillations: Lessons from Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.Neuroscientist. 2020 Feb;26(1):57-73. doi: 10.1177/1073858419828646. Epub 2019 Feb 7. Neuroscientist. 2020. PMID: 30730265 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pathway and directional specificity of Hebbian plasticity in the cortical visual motion processing network.iScience. 2023 Jun 7;26(7):107064. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107064. eCollection 2023 Jul 21. iScience. 2023. PMID: 37408682 Free PMC article.
-
The role of the somatosensory system in the feeling of emotions: a neurostimulation study.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024 Oct 18;19(1):nsae062. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsae062. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 39275796 Free PMC article.
-
Using Electroencephalography to Advance Mindfulness Science: A Survey of Emerging Methods and Approaches.Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2025 Apr;10(4):342-349. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.09.012. Epub 2024 Oct 5. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2025. PMID: 39369988 Review.
References
-
- Insel TR, Gogtay N. National Institute of Mental Health clinical trials: new opportunities, new expectations. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71:745–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.426. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Krystal JH, State MW. Psychiatric disorders: diagnosis to therapy. Cell. 2014;157:201–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.042. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Filmer HL, Dux PE, Mattingley JB. Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation for understanding brain function. Trends Neurosci. 2014;37:742–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2014.08.003. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bikson M, Grossman P, Thomas C, Zannou AL, Jiang J, Adnan T, et al. Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence based update. Brain Stimulat. 2016;9:641–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Reato D, Rahman A, Bikson M, Parra LC. Effects of weak transcranial alternating current stimulation on brain activity—a review of known mechanisms from animal studies. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00687. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials