Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May-Jun;11(3):465-480.
doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 29.

Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: An NIMH-sponsored workshop

Affiliations
Review

Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: An NIMH-sponsored workshop

Marom Bikson et al. Brain Stimul. 2018 May-Jun.

Abstract

Background: Neuropsychiatric disorders are a leading source of disability and require novel treatments that target mechanisms of disease. As such disorders are thought to result from aberrant neuronal circuit activity, neuromodulation approaches are of increasing interest given their potential for manipulating circuits directly. Low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) with direct currents (transcranial direct current stimulation, tDCS) or alternating currents (transcranial alternating current stimulation, tACS) represent novel, safe, well-tolerated, and relatively inexpensive putative treatment modalities.

Objective: This report seeks to promote the science, technology and effective clinical applications of these modalities, identify research challenges, and suggest approaches for addressing these needs in order to achieve rigorous, reproducible findings that can advance clinical treatment.

Methods: The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) convened a workshop in September 2016 that brought together experts in basic and human neuroscience, electrical stimulation biophysics and devices, and clinical trial methods to examine the physiological mechanisms underlying tDCS/tACS, technologies and technical strategies for optimizing stimulation protocols, and the state of the science with respect to therapeutic applications and trial designs.

Results: Advances in understanding mechanisms, methodological and technological improvements (e.g., electronics, computational models to facilitate proper dosing), and improved clinical trial designs are poised to advance rigorous, reproducible therapeutic applications of these techniques. A number of challenges were identified and meeting participants made recommendations made to address them.

Conclusions: These recommendations align with requirements in NIMH funding opportunity announcements to, among other needs, define dosimetry, demonstrate dose/response relationships, implement rigorous blinded trial designs, employ computational modeling, and demonstrate target engagement when testing stimulation-based interventions for the treatment of mental disorders.

Keywords: Neuromodulation; Reproducibility; Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS); Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial disclosures

Lucas Parra and Marom Bikson are co-founders of Soterix Medical Inc. and co-inventors in patents held by the City College of New York (CCNY). The goal of these efforts is to make High-Definition tDCS broadly available. Flavio Frohlich is the founder, majority owner, and chief scientific officer of Pulvinar Neuro LLC, which markets devices for tDCS/tACS research. The University of North Carolina has filed several patents based on his inventions. Andre Russowsky Brunoni receives a CAPES-Humboldt research fellowship for experienced researchers. Colleen Loo received tDCS equipment from Soterix for conducting independent, investigator-initiated clinical trials. Zhi-De Deng and Sarah H. Lisanby are co-inventors on TMS technology, unrelated to the topics presented here. Drs. Charvet, Clark, Cohen, Dmochowski, Edwards, Kappen-man, Lim, Mantovani, McMullen, Richardson, Rumsey, Sehatpour, Sommers, Wassermann and Woods, Ms. Unal, and Ms. Pearson report no conflicts.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Common tDCS/tACS montages and corresponding simulated electric field distribution
A. M1-SO configuration: Sponge electrodes, one over left primary motor cortex, one over the contralateral supraorbital ridge. B. Bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex configuration: Sponge electrodes over the F3 and F4 EEG sites. C. 4 × 1 HD-tDCS M1 configuration: High-definition electrodes, one over M1, four return electrodes surrounding the center electrode. The electric field was simulated with a current amplitude of 1 mA. Electric field simulation was performed using SimNIBS 2.0.1 [191].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Insel TR, Gogtay N. National Institute of Mental Health clinical trials: new opportunities, new expectations. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71:745–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.426. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krystal JH, State MW. Psychiatric disorders: diagnosis to therapy. Cell. 2014;157:201–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.042. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Filmer HL, Dux PE, Mattingley JB. Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation for understanding brain function. Trends Neurosci. 2014;37:742–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2014.08.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bikson M, Grossman P, Thomas C, Zannou AL, Jiang J, Adnan T, et al. Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence based update. Brain Stimulat. 2016;9:641–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reato D, Rahman A, Bikson M, Parra LC. Effects of weak transcranial alternating current stimulation on brain activity—a review of known mechanisms from animal studies. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00687. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms