Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: An NIMH-sponsored workshop
- PMID: 29398575
- PMCID: PMC5997279
- DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.008
Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: An NIMH-sponsored workshop
Abstract
Background: Neuropsychiatric disorders are a leading source of disability and require novel treatments that target mechanisms of disease. As such disorders are thought to result from aberrant neuronal circuit activity, neuromodulation approaches are of increasing interest given their potential for manipulating circuits directly. Low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) with direct currents (transcranial direct current stimulation, tDCS) or alternating currents (transcranial alternating current stimulation, tACS) represent novel, safe, well-tolerated, and relatively inexpensive putative treatment modalities.
Objective: This report seeks to promote the science, technology and effective clinical applications of these modalities, identify research challenges, and suggest approaches for addressing these needs in order to achieve rigorous, reproducible findings that can advance clinical treatment.
Methods: The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) convened a workshop in September 2016 that brought together experts in basic and human neuroscience, electrical stimulation biophysics and devices, and clinical trial methods to examine the physiological mechanisms underlying tDCS/tACS, technologies and technical strategies for optimizing stimulation protocols, and the state of the science with respect to therapeutic applications and trial designs.
Results: Advances in understanding mechanisms, methodological and technological improvements (e.g., electronics, computational models to facilitate proper dosing), and improved clinical trial designs are poised to advance rigorous, reproducible therapeutic applications of these techniques. A number of challenges were identified and meeting participants made recommendations made to address them.
Conclusions: These recommendations align with requirements in NIMH funding opportunity announcements to, among other needs, define dosimetry, demonstrate dose/response relationships, implement rigorous blinded trial designs, employ computational modeling, and demonstrate target engagement when testing stimulation-based interventions for the treatment of mental disorders.
Keywords: Neuromodulation; Reproducibility; Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS); Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES).
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Lucas Parra and Marom Bikson are co-founders of Soterix Medical Inc. and co-inventors in patents held by the City College of New York (CCNY). The goal of these efforts is to make High-Definition tDCS broadly available. Flavio Frohlich is the founder, majority owner, and chief scientific officer of Pulvinar Neuro LLC, which markets devices for tDCS/tACS research. The University of North Carolina has filed several patents based on his inventions. Andre Russowsky Brunoni receives a CAPES-Humboldt research fellowship for experienced researchers. Colleen Loo received tDCS equipment from Soterix for conducting independent, investigator-initiated clinical trials. Zhi-De Deng and Sarah H. Lisanby are co-inventors on TMS technology, unrelated to the topics presented here. Drs. Charvet, Clark, Cohen, Dmochowski, Edwards, Kappen-man, Lim, Mantovani, McMullen, Richardson, Rumsey, Sehatpour, Sommers, Wassermann and Woods, Ms. Unal, and Ms. Pearson report no conflicts.
Figures
References
-
- Insel TR, Gogtay N. National Institute of Mental Health clinical trials: new opportunities, new expectations. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71:745–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.426. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Krystal JH, State MW. Psychiatric disorders: diagnosis to therapy. Cell. 2014;157:201–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.042. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Filmer HL, Dux PE, Mattingley JB. Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation for understanding brain function. Trends Neurosci. 2014;37:742–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2014.08.003. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bikson M, Grossman P, Thomas C, Zannou AL, Jiang J, Adnan T, et al. Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence based update. Brain Stimulat. 2016;9:641–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Reato D, Rahman A, Bikson M, Parra LC. Effects of weak transcranial alternating current stimulation on brain activity—a review of known mechanisms from animal studies. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00687. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
