Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jan-Mar;22(1):e2017.00053.
doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00053.

Evaluation of New Technologies in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Affiliations
Review

Evaluation of New Technologies in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Murat Akarsu et al. JSLS. 2018 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) tumors are the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. Endoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis of GI cancers. Early diagnosis of GI tumors by endoscopy at the precancerous or early stage may decrease the prevalence and mortality rate of GI cancers. The preventive role of endoscopic interventions and the limitations of conventional white-light endoscopy have given rise to myriad innovations. Chromoendoscopy with dye injection can be used to detect lesions at an early stage. However, the prolonged procedure duration and steep learning curve are disadvantages of chromoendoscopy. Recent technological advances in imaging enhancement have enabled detection of GI lesions without the need for dye injection, using digital chromoendoscopy systems, of which flexible spectral-imaging color enhancement, narrow-band imaging, and I-Scan are the most frequently used. The combination of endoscopic image magnification and high-definition optical systems using digital endoscopic methods has increased the diagnostic value of endoscopy. The development of confocal laser endomicroscopy has also improved in vivo endoscopic diagnosis. This review focuses on the latest technological innovations in endoscopy.

Keywords: Digital chromoendoscopy; Endomicroscopy; Endoscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Gastric ulcer. Endoscopic view after administration of N-acetyl cysteine and methylene blue dye.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
NBI images of gastric ulcer.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
FICE images of colonic flat adenomas.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
I-Scan images of colonic polyps.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Cellvizio images of a gastric polyp.

References

    1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, et al. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64:9–29. - PubMed
    1. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-SocietyTask Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–857. - PubMed
    1. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:24–28. - PubMed
    1. VanRijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:343–350. - PubMed
    1. Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, et al. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy. 2008;40:284–290. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources