Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jul 1:2:112.
doi: 10.21037/jovs.2016.06.08. eCollection 2016.

Subxiphoid single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Affiliations

Subxiphoid single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Chia-Chuan Liu et al. J Vis Surg. .

Abstract

Background: We report the feasibility and safety of chest surgery through the subxiphoid single port approach based on our preliminary experience.

Methods: From December 2013 till January 2016, 39 patients underwent 40 thoracoscopic surgeries via a 3- to 4-cm subxiphoid single incision. A sternal lifter was applied for better entrance and working angle. A zero-degree deflectable scope was preferred. The technique for anatomic resection was similar to that in the traditional single-port approach. Patient characteristics and demographic data were analyzed.

Results: There were 29 females and 10 males, with a median age of 56 years. Indication for surgery included 24 patients with primary lung cancer, eight with lung metastases, two with benign lung lesions, one with bilateral pneumothorax, and five with mediastinal tumors. Surgeries included lobectomy in 21, segmentectomy in five, wedge resection in nine, and mediastinal surgery in five patients. There was no surgical mortality. Complications (10%, 4 in 40) included postoperative bleeding in one patient, chylothorax in one patient, and transient arrhythmia in the early learning curve in two patients.

Conclusions: Our results indicated that subxiphoid single-incision thoracoscopic pulmonary resection could be performed safely but under careful patient selection with modification of instruments. Moreover, having a previous single-port incision experience was crucial. Major limitations of this approach included more frequently encountered instrument fighting; interference of left-side procedure related to heartbeat and radical mediastinal lymph node (LN) dissection; and the ability to handle complex conditions, such as anthracotic LNs, diffuse adhesion, and major bleeding.

Keywords: Subxiphoid; lobectomy; segmentectomy; single-port; thoracoscopic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Novel method for creation of subxiphoid single port. (A,B) Under thoracoscopic guidance, pleura cavity was entered with laparoscopic hook cautery; (C) an Alexis Wound Retractor (Applied Medical, USA) was partially inserted into a 12 mm laparoscopic trocar (Endopath Xcel Bladeless Trocars, Ethicon, USA) to facilitate the application of wound protector, and lifted the sternum with a retractor; (D) completion view of subxiphoid single port.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Modification of instruments used during subxiphoid single port lung resection. (A) An 10 mm articulating thoracoscope (EndoEye Flex, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan); (B) a novel laparoscopic instruments with adjustable and rotatable wrist (LYD RealAngle Articulating Instrument, Ningbo LYD Med Tech, China); (C) double joint thoracoscopic instruments (Scanlan international, USA), Harmonic scalpel (Ethicon, USA) and other laparoscopic instruments; (D) dissection of left upper superior pulmonary vein during trisegmentectomy via subxiphoid single port approach.
Figure 3
Figure 3
3D reconstructed CT images and intra-operative photos during subxiphoid approach. (A) 3D-CT reconstruction image from computer tomography scan showing the anatomic relationship between hilar structures to the subxiphoid area; (B) endostpaler inserted through subxiphoid incision for transection of the right middle lobe (RML) vein; (C) specimen retrieval through the subxiphoid incision is easier than through the narrow intercostal space. CT, computed tomography.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scott WJ, Allen MS, Darling G, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:976-81; discussion 981-3. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.059 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stephens N, Rice D, Correa A, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with improved short-term and equivalent oncological outcomes compared with open lobectomy for clinical Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of 963 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014;46:607-13. 10.1093/ejcts/ezu036 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Onaitis MW, Petersen RP, Balderson SS, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a safe and versatile procedure: experience with 500 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2006;244:420-5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Swanson SJ, Herndon JE, 2nd, D'Amico TA, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: report of CALGB 39802--a prospective, multi-institution feasibility study. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:4993-7. 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.6649 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paul S, Altorki NK, Sheng S, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:366-78. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.08.026 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources