Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 28;140(8):3035-3039.
doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b13281. Epub 2018 Feb 12.

Long-Lived Charge-Transfer States of Nickel(II) Aryl Halide Complexes Facilitate Bimolecular Photoinduced Electron Transfer

Affiliations

Long-Lived Charge-Transfer States of Nickel(II) Aryl Halide Complexes Facilitate Bimolecular Photoinduced Electron Transfer

Benjamin J Shields et al. J Am Chem Soc. .

Abstract

Here we investigate the photophysics and photochemistry of Ni(II) aryl halide complexes common to cross-coupling and Ni/photoredox reactions. Computational and ultrafast spectroscopic studies reveal that these complexes feature long-lived 3MLCT excited states, implicating Ni as an underexplored alternative to precious metal photocatalysts. Moreover, we show that 3MLCT Ni(II) engages in bimolecular electron transfer with ground-state Ni(II), which enables access to Ni(III) in the absence of external oxidants or photoredox catalysts. As such, it is possible to facilitate Ni-catalyzed C-O bond formation solely by visible light irradiation, thus representing an alternative strategy for catalyst activation in Ni cross-coupling reactions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A) Electronic structure of d6 photocatalysts compared to Ni(II) aryl halide complexes. (B) Structure of Ni complexes and X-ray crystal structure of 1-Cl. (C) Comparison of component absorption spectra. (D) Absorption spectra for aryl halide complexes.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Summary of computational studies. (A) DFT computed electronic structure of 1-Cl displayed together with Kohn–Sham orbitals. (B) TD-DFT computed absorption spectrum, peak assignments, and population analysis. Difference density isosurfaces demonstrate the loss (red) and build-up (blue) of electron density. Changes in charge are normalized such that Δδ Ni(III)–Ni(II) = 1.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Initial transient absorption experiments. (A) Full contour plot for TA spectrum of 1-Cl (pump 295 nm). (B) Comparison of TA spectra of free dtbbpy (1–1000 ps, pump 305 nm), Ni(dtbbpy)Cl2 (1–60 ps, pump 295 nm), and 1-Cl (1–1000 ps, pump 295 nm ).(C) Single-wavelength kinetics for Ni(dtbbpy)Cl2 (367 nm, pump 295 nm) and 1-Cl (476 nm, pump 400 nm). (D) Experimental spectrum versus simulated 3MLCT1 spectrum of 1-Cl.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Summary of photophysics Ni(II) aryl halide complexes and evolution of TA spectra for 1-Cl upon visible excitation (λpump = 400 nm). (A) Jablonski diagram for all aryl halide complexes. (B) Initial cooling. (C) ISC associated spectral evolution (τISC = 1.1 ps). (D) Bleach broadening. (E) Decay to ground state (τnr3 = 4.1 ns). The negative feature at 400 nm is the result of pump scattering.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Criteria for bimolecular photoinduced electron transfer. (A) Visible light photolysis and thermolysis experiments. (i) Yield determined by 1H NMR. (ii) Conversion is reported. (B) Experimental concentration dependent kinetics (solid blue) plotted together with 95% confidence interval (blue shading) and simulated saturation kinetics (black dashed). (C) Kinetic hypothesis.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Ni-catalyzed C–O coupling and proposed mechanism. Yields determined by GC-FID using 1-fluoronaphthalene as an external standard.

References

    1. Nozik AJ; Miller J Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6443. - PubMed
    1. (a)Grätzel M Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 6841. - PubMed
    2. (b)Morris AJ; Meyer GJ; Fujita E Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1983. - PubMed
    3. (c)Esswein AJ; Nocera DG Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 4022. - PubMed
    4. (d)Willkomm J; Orchard KL; Reynal A; Pastor E; Durrant JR; Reisner E Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 9. - PubMed
    1. (a)Romero NA; Nicewicz DA Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 10075. - PubMed
    2. (b)Prier CK; Rankic DA; MacMillan DW Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 5322. - PMC - PubMed
    3. (c)Tucker JW; Stephenson CR J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 1617. - PubMed
    4. (d)Schultz DM; Yoon TP Science 2014, 343, 1239176. - PMC - PubMed
    1. (a)Kavarnos GJ; Turro NJ Chem. Rev. 1986, 86, 401.
    2. (b)Arias-Rotondo DM; McCusker JK Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 5803. - PubMed
    3. (c)Kalyanasundaram K Coord. Chem. Rev. 1982, 46, 159.
    1. (a)Larsen CB; Wenger OS Chem. -Eur. J. 2017, 23, xxx.
    2. (b)Liu Y; Persson P; Sundstrom V; Warnmark K Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 1477. - PubMed
    3. (c)Scaltrito DV; Thompson DW; O’Callaghan JA; Meyer GJ Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 208, 243.
    4. (d)Büldt LA; Guo X; Vogel R; Prescimone A; Wenger OS J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 985. - PubMed
    5. (e)Creutz SE; Lotito KJ; Fu GC; Peters JC Science 2012, 338, 647. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources