Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar 6;96(2):728-738.
doi: 10.1093/jas/skx064.

Preslaughter handling practices and their effects on animal welfare and pork quality

Affiliations

Preslaughter handling practices and their effects on animal welfare and pork quality

Luigi Faucitano. J Anim Sci. .

Abstract

At all times, prior to slaughter, pigs may experience stress from a range of handling practices, such as fasting, loading and transport, mixing, and interaction with humans. These factors can affect the welfare of pigs and carcass and meat quality, both individually and collectively. Preslaughter stress is both an animal welfare and a meat quality issue. Behavioral and physiological studies have revealed that poor handling practices at the farm, during transport and at the slaughter plant, have an adverse effect on pigs and may result in the loss of profits due to animal losses during transport and in lairage. Also, poor preslaughter handling can also lead to losses in carcass value as a result of reduced yield, the presence of lesions and bacterial contamination, and meat quality defects (e.g., pale, soft, exudative and dark, firm, dry pork). These economic losses can be limited by improving the design of facilities, controlling the environmental conditions, and implementing training programs for the correct animal handling at any stage preslaughter. The objective of this review was to review research findings on the effects of preslaughter practices on ante-mortem behavioral and physiological response in pigs, including muscle metabolism, and to provide recommendations aimed at limiting the impact of preslaughter handling on animal losses and pork quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arnone M., and Dantzer R.. 1980. Does frustration induce aggression in pigs?Appl. Anim. Ethol. 6:351–362.
    1. Averós X., Knowles T.G., Brown S.N., Warriss P.D., and Gosálvez L.F.. 2008. Factors affecting the mortality of pigs being transported to slaughter. Vet. Rec. 163:386–390. doi:10.1136/vr.163.13.386 - PubMed
    1. Barton-Gade P. 2008. Effect of rearing system and mixing at loading on transport and lairage behavior and meat quality: comparison of free range and conventionally raised pigs. Anim. 2:1238–1246. doi:10.1017/S1751731108002565 - PubMed
    1. Barton-Gade P., Christensen L., Baltzer M., and Petersen J.V.. 2007. Causes of pre- slaughter mortality in Danish slaughter pigs with special emphasis on transport. Anim. Welf. 16:459–470.
    1. Benjamin M.E., Gonyou H.W., Ivers D.J., Richardson L.F., Jones D.J., Wagner J.R., Seneriz R., and Anderson D.B.. 2001. Effect of animal handling method on the incidence of stress response in market swine in a model system. J. Anim. Sci. 79(Suppl. 1):279.

LinkOut - more resources