Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018;27(2):158-165.
doi: 10.1159/000487323. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

Effect of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Pain after Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Meta-Analysis

Effect of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Pain after Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Lin Liu et al. Med Princ Pract. 2018.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in patients undergoing colorectal surgery (CRS).

Materials and methods: The databases of PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Embase were searched, and randomized controlled studies (RCTs) that compared TAP block to control for relief of postoperative pain in patients who underwent CRS were included. Outcomes, including postoperative pain at rest and with movement, morphine use, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and the length of hospital stay, were analyzed using STATA software. The weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) or relative risk with 95% CI were used to present the strength of associations.

Results: A total of 7 RCTs with 511 patients were included. The results of this study suggested that TAP block significantly relieved postoperative pain during postanesthetic recovery after CRS at rest and during movement (WMDs were -0.98 [95% CI -1.57 to -0.38] and -0.68 [-1.07 to -0.30], respectively), and also decreased pain intensity during movement 24 h after CRS (WMD: -0.57 [95% CI -1.06 to -0.08]). TAP block significantly reduced opioid consumption within 24 h when compared to controls, with a WMD of 15.66 (95% CI -23.93 to -7.39). However, TAP block did not shorten the length of hospital stay.

Conclusions: TAP block was an effective approach for relief of postoperative pain and reduced postoperative consumption of morphine. More RCTs with large sample sizes are required to confirm these findings.

Keywords: Analgesic efficacy; Colorectal surgery; Postoperative pain; Transversus abdominis plane block.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Effect of transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative pain during postanesthetic recovery (PAR) and 24 h after colorectal surgery. a Postoperative pain during PAR after surgery at rest. b Postoperative pain during PAR after surgery during movement. c Postoperative pain 24 h after surgery at rest. d Postoperative pain 24 h after surgery during movement.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
The impact of transversus abdominis plane block on opioid use after colorectal surgery.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients and controls.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Length of hospital stay of patients and controls.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Buvanendran A, Kroin JS. Multimodal analgesia for controlling acute postoperative pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:588–593. - PubMed
    1. Tikuisis R, Miliauskas P, Lukoseviciene V, et al. Transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain relief after hand-assisted laparoscopic colon surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Tech Coloproctol. 2016;20:835–844. - PubMed
    1. Cheng YJ. Lidocaine SKIN PAtch (Lidopat® 5%) is effective in the treatment of traumatic rib fractures: a prospective double-blinded and vehicle-controlled study. Med Princ Pract. 2016;25:36–39. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kehlet H, Rung GW, Callesen T. Postoperative opioid analgesia: time for a reconsideration? J Clin Anesth. 1996;8:441–445. - PubMed
    1. Rafi AN. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:1024–1026. - PubMed

Publication types