Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology
- PMID: 29403370
- PMCID: PMC5778115
- DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2017.00076
Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology
Keywords: artifacts; computational science; repeatability; replicability; reproducibility.
References
-
- Association for Computing Machinery (2016). Artifact Review and Badging. Available online at: https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/artifact-review-badging (Accessed November 24, 2017).
-
- Baggerly K. A., Coombes K. R. (2009). Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology Ann. Appl. Stat. 3, 1309–1334. 10.1214/09-AOAS291 - DOI
-
- Bollen K., Cacioppo J. T., Kaplan R., Krosnick J., Olds J. L. (2015). Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences Perspectives on Robust and Reliable Science. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; Available online at: https://www.nsf.gov/sbe/SBE_Spring_2015_AC_Meeting_Presentations/Bollen_... (Accessed December 8, 2017).
-
- Claerbout J. F., Karrenbach M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Expanded Abstracts 11, 601–604. 10.1190/1.1822162 - DOI
-
- Crook S., Davison A. P., Plesser H. E. (2013). Learning from the past: approaches for reproducibility in computational neuroscience, in 20 Years in Computational Neuroscience, ed Bower J. M. (New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media; ), 73–102. 10.1007/978-1-4614-1424-7_4 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
