Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study
- PMID: 29404729
- PMCID: PMC6061052
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6075-6
Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4706. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6390-y. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 30120581 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: To compare the diagnostic yield and safety of 22G endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions.
Methods: Between April 2014 and September 2015, 36 patients with pancreatic solid lesions were included for endoscopic ultrasound test. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: EUS-FNA (n = 18) and EUS-FNB (n = 18). Each nidus was punctured three times (15 ~ 20 insertions for each puncture) with a 22G needle. The core specimens were analyzed, and the diagnostic yields of FNA and FNB were evaluated.
Results: The procedure success rate was 100% with no complications. Cytological and histological examinations found that the diagnostic yield of FNB and FNA were both 83.3%. To get a definitive diagnosis, FNB needed fewer punctures than FNA (1.11 vs. 1.83; P < 0.05).
Conclusions: 22G EUS-FNB is a safe and effective way to diagnose pancreatic solid lesions. FNB required a lower number of needle passes to achieve a diagnosis compared with FNA.
Keywords: Pancreatic solid lesion; Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration; Ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Li Tian, Dr. An-liu Tang, Dr. Lei Zhang, Dr. Xiao-wen Liu, Dr. Jing-bo Li, Prof. Fen Wang, Prof. Shou-rong Shen, and Prof. Xiao-yan Wang have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep 29;15:122. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0352-9. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26419845 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;53(1):94-99. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1390597. Epub 2017 Oct 24. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 29065734 Clinical Trial.
-
22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms.Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan;54(1):101-107. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1564362. Epub 2019 Feb 7. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 30731044
-
Current status of newer generation endoscopic ultrasound core needles in the diagnostic evaluation of gastrointestinal lesions.J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2020 Sep-Oct;9(5):389-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 Jun 5. J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2020. PMID: 32680792 Review.
-
Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration vs fine needle biopsy for pancreatic masses, subepithelial lesions, and lymph nodes.World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 14;27(26):4194-4207. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i26.4194. World J Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 34326619 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative diagnostic accuracy of EUS needles in solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.Endosc Int Open. 2021 Jun;9(6):E853-E862. doi: 10.1055/a-1381-7301. Epub 2021 May 27. Endosc Int Open. 2021. PMID: 34079867 Free PMC article.
-
Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the screening and follow-up of high-risk individuals for familial pancreatic cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep 14;25(34):5082-5096. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i34.5082. World J Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 31558858 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study.Endosc Int Open. 2019 Aug;7(8):E955-E963. doi: 10.1055/a-0903-2565. Epub 2019 Jul 24. Endosc Int Open. 2019. PMID: 31367675 Free PMC article.
-
A Pilot Randomized Crossover Trial of Wet Suction and Conventional Techniques of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions.Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2021 Mar 22;2021:4913107. doi: 10.1155/2021/4913107. eCollection 2021. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2021. PMID: 33824658 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Performance of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy with Histological Analysis Versus Combined Cytohistological Analysis in Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jul 6. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09175-9. Online ahead of print. Dig Dis Sci. 2025. PMID: 40618287
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous