Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Aug;32(8):3533-3539.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6075-6. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study

Li Tian et al. Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: To compare the diagnostic yield and safety of 22G endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions.

Methods: Between April 2014 and September 2015, 36 patients with pancreatic solid lesions were included for endoscopic ultrasound test. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: EUS-FNA (n = 18) and EUS-FNB (n = 18). Each nidus was punctured three times (15 ~ 20 insertions for each puncture) with a 22G needle. The core specimens were analyzed, and the diagnostic yields of FNA and FNB were evaluated.

Results: The procedure success rate was 100% with no complications. Cytological and histological examinations found that the diagnostic yield of FNB and FNA were both 83.3%. To get a definitive diagnosis, FNB needed fewer punctures than FNA (1.11 vs. 1.83; P < 0.05).

Conclusions: 22G EUS-FNB is a safe and effective way to diagnose pancreatic solid lesions. FNB required a lower number of needle passes to achieve a diagnosis compared with FNA.

Keywords: Pancreatic solid lesion; Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration; Ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Li Tian, Dr. An-liu Tang, Dr. Lei Zhang, Dr. Xiao-wen Liu, Dr. Jing-bo Li, Prof. Fen Wang, Prof. Shou-rong Shen, and Prof. Xiao-yan Wang have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
EUS-guided biopsy from pancreatic solid masses using FNA (A) and FNB (B)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Tissue core obtained using the 22G fine-needle biopsy needle by EUS-FNA (A) and FNB (B)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Histological evaluation of specimens obtained (hematoxylin & eosin [H&E] staining). A pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, sample obtained using the new 22G fine-needle biopsy needle by EUS-FNA. B pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, sample obtained using standard fine-needle aspiration needle by EUS-FNB

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Maitra A, Hruban RH. Pancreatic cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2008;3:157–188. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.154305. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cui X, Zhang Y, Yang J, Sun X, Hagan JP, Guha S, Li M. ZIP4 confers resistance to zinc deficiency-induced apoptosis in pancreatic cancer. Cell Cycle. 2014;13:1180–1186. doi: 10.4161/cc.28111. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pietryga JA, Morgan DE. Imaging preoperatively for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;6:343–357. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Del Chiaro M, Segersvard R, Lohr M, Verbeke C. Early detection and prevention of pancreatic cancer: is it really possible today? World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:12118–12131. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i34.12118. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ngamruengphong S, Li F, Zhou Y, Chak A, Cooper GS, Das A. EUS and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: a population-based study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:78–83. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.072. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types