Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Feb 5;22(2):11.
doi: 10.1007/s11916-018-0662-z.

Intrathecal Drug Delivery and Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Cancer Pain

Affiliations
Review

Intrathecal Drug Delivery and Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Cancer Pain

Fangfang Xing et al. Curr Pain Headache Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: The purpose of the present investigation is to summarize the body and quality of evidence including the most recent studies in support of intrathecal drug delivery systems and spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of cancer-related pain.

Recent findings: In the past 3 years, a number of prospective studies have been published supporting intrathecal drug delivery systems for cancer pain. Additional investigation with adjuvants to morphine-based analgesia including dexmedetomidine and ziconotide support drug-induced benefits of patient-controlled intrathecal analgesia. A study has also been recently published regarding cost-savings for intrathecal drug delivery system compared to pharmacologic management, but an analysis in the Ontario, Canada healthcare system projects additional financial costs. Finally, the Polyanalgesic Consensus Committee has updated its recommendations regarding clinical guidelines for intrathecal drug delivery systems to include new information on dosing, trialing, safety, and systemic opioid reduction. There is still a paucity of clinical evidence for spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of cancer pain. There are new intrathecal drugs under investigation including various conopeptides and AYX1. Large, prospective, modern, randomized controlled studies are still needed to support the use of both intrathecal drug delivery systems as well as spinal cord stimulation for cancer pain populations. There are multiple prospective and small randomized controlled studies that highlight a potential promising future for these interventional modalities. Related to the challenge and urgency of cancer pain, the pain practitioner community is moving toward a multimodal approach that includes discussions regarding the role of intrathecal therapies and spinal cord stimulation to the individualized treatment of patients.

Keywords: Cancer pain; Interventional technique; Intrathecal drug delivery system; Intrathecal pump; Neuromodulation; Spinal cord stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Oct;59(9):1103-15 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2012 Mar;29(2):93-7 - PubMed
    1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Jan 29;16(1):1-51 - PubMed
    1. J Support Oncol. 2010 Mar-Apr;8(2):52-9 - PubMed
    1. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Mar;96(11):e6354 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources