Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;22(8):2787-2797.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2365-6. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

Roughness, surface energy, and superficial damages of CAD/CAM materials after surface treatment

Affiliations

Roughness, surface energy, and superficial damages of CAD/CAM materials after surface treatment

Thomas Strasser et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of surface pre-treatment on CAD/CAM materials including ceramics, zirconia, resin-infiltrated ceramic, and resin-based composite.

Materials and methods: Specimens were made of ten CAD/CAM materials (Celtra Duo, Degudent, D; Vita Suprinity, Vita, D; E.max CAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent, FL; E.max ZirCAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent, FL; Vita Enamic, Vita, D; Cerasmart, GC, B; LAVA Ultimate, 3M, D; SHOFU Block HC, SHOFU, US; Grandio Blocs, VOCO, D; BRILLIANT Crios, Coltene, CH) and pretreated to represent clinical procedures (Hf 20 s/5%; phosphoric acid 20 s/37%; Monobond etch and prime (Ivoclar-Vivadent, FL); water-cooled diamond bur (80 μm; 4 μm); Al2O3-blasting (50 μm/1 bar, 50 μm/2 bar, 120 μm/1 bar, 120 μm/2 bar); untreated; manufacturer's instructions). SEM-analysis (Phenom, FEI, NL) of the surfaces was performed (magnifications ≤ 10,000×). Roughness values Ra, Rz (KJ 3D, Keyence, J), and surface energy SE (OCA15 plus, SCA20, DataPhysics, D) were determined (statistics: non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test/Kruskal-Wallis test for independent specimen, α = 0.05).

Results: Kruskal-Wallis revealed significant (p < 0.001) differences for all materials with different surface treatments. Roughness ranged from Ra = 0.05 μm (VS; D4)/Rz = 0.41 μm (VS; D4) to Ra = 1.82 μm (EMA; SB120/2)/Rz = 12.05 μm (CS; SB 120/2), SE from 22.7 mN/m (VE; M) to 52.8 mN/m (CD; M). SEM analysis showed material-dependent damages after pre-treatment.

Conclusion: Different CAD/CAM materials require individual pre-treatment for optimized and protective surface activation.

Clinical relevance: Cementation is a key factor for clinical success. Given the variety of available CAD/CAM materials, specific procedures are needed.

Keywords: CAD/CAM; Ceramic; Composite; Damage; Defect; Lithium disilicate; Lithium silicate; Resin-based material; Roughness; Surface energy; Zirconia-reinforced ceramic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(6):855-62 - PubMed
    1. J Adhes Dent. 2015 Feb;17(1):7-26 - PubMed
    1. J Dent Res. 2014 Apr;93(4):329-34 - PubMed
    1. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014 Nov-Dec;26(6):382-93 - PubMed
    1. Oper Dent. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):73-81 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources