Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;27(10):1085-1091.
doi: 10.1002/pds.4396. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

Position matters: Validation of medicare hospital claims for myocardial infarction against medical record review in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study

Affiliations

Position matters: Validation of medicare hospital claims for myocardial infarction against medical record review in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study

Montika Bush et al. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: The objectives of this study were to investigate sensitivity and specificity of myocardial infarction (MI) case definitions using multiple discharge code positions and multiple diagnosis codes when comparing administrative data to hospital surveillance data.

Methods: Hospital surveillance data for ARIC Study cohort participants with matching participant ID and service dates to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) hospitalization records for hospitalizations occurring between 2001 and 2013 were included in this study. Classification of Definite or Probable MI from ARIC medical record review defined "gold standard" comparison for validation measures. In primary analyses, an MI was defined with ICD9 code 410 from CMS records. Secondary analyses defined MI using code 410 in combination with additional codes.

Results: A total of 25 549 hospitalization records met study criteria. In primary analysis, specificity was at least 0.98 for all CMS definitions by discharge code position. Sensitivity ranged from 0.48 for primary position only to 0.63 when definition included any discharge code position. The sensitivity of definitions including codes 410 and 411.1 were higher than sensitivity observed when using code 410 alone. Specificity of these alternate definitions was higher for women (0.98) than for men (0.96).

Conclusion: Algorithms that rely exclusively on primary discharge code position will miss approximately 50% of all MI cases due to low sensitivity of this definition. We recommend defining MI by code 410 in any of first 5 discharge code positions overall and by codes 410 and 411.1 in any of first 3 positions for sensitivity analyses of women.

Keywords: Medicare; myocardial infarction; validation studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of Medicare to ARIC record matching
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Sensitivity and specificity of Medicare ICD9 code 410 (excluding 410.x2) to identify an MI when compared with ARIC classification of definite or probable MI by discharge code position [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Sensitivity of Medicare hospitalization records containing ICD9 discharge code 410.xx (excluding 410.x2) to identify an MI when compared with ARIC classification of definite or probable MI stratified by sex, age at hospitalization, and discharge code position

References

    1. Choma NN, Griffin MR, Huang RL, et al. An algorithm to identify incident myocardial infarction using Medicaid data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(11):1064–1071. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kiyota Y, Schneeweiss S, Glynn RJ, Cannuscio CC, Avorn J, Solomon DH. Accuracy of medicare claims-based diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: estimating positive predictive value on the basis of review of hospital records. Am Heart J. 2004;148(1):99–104. - PubMed
    1. Cutrona SL, Toh S, Iyer A, et al. Validation of acute myocardial infarction in the Food and Drug Administration’s mini-sentinel program. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(1):40–54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Psaty BM, Delaney JA, Arnold AM, et al. Study of cardiovascular health outcomes in the era of claims data: The cardiovascular health study. Circulation. 2016;133(2):156–164. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pladevall M, Goff DC, Nichaman MZ, et al. An assessment of the validity of ICD Code 410 to identify hospital admissions for myocardial infarction: The Corpus Christi heart project. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25(5):948–952. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms