Quantifying the Additional Difficulty of Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Re-Do Pyeloplasty: A Comparison of Primary and Re-Do Procedures
- PMID: 29406807
- DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0691
Quantifying the Additional Difficulty of Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Re-Do Pyeloplasty: A Comparison of Primary and Re-Do Procedures
Abstract
Background: Re-do pyeloplasty after failed open or laparoscopic ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction correction can be a challenging procedure because of scar formation at the previous anastomosis site and decreased vascularity of the ureter. This study compared the perioperative parameters for pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) primary and re-do pyeloplasties with an emphasis on the intra-operative parameters.
Materials and methods: We compared the perioperative parameters of pediatric RAL procedures performed by a single surgeon at a tertiary care children's hospital for both primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) and recurrent UPJO after a previous open or laparoscopic procedure over 2013-2015. The operative time was subdivided as total operative time, console time, port placement time, dissection time to UPJ, and anastomosis time.
Results: A total of 65 pediatric RAL pyeloplasty procedures for UPJO were performed (55 primary and 10 re-do pyeloplasties) during the study period. The console times were 43.3% longer for re-do pyeloplasties than for primary pyeloplasties (133.0 ± 30.7 versus 92.8 ± 24.0 minutes, respectively, P < .01). The re-do cases had longer operative times, especially for UPJ exposure (52.2 ± 21.0 versus 28.0 ± 14.0 minutes, P < .01). There were no conversions to open surgery or significant perioperative complications. There was no difference in hospital pain medication usage and hospital length of stay between the 2 groups. The treatment success rates were 98.2% (54/55) and 100% (10/10), respectively.
Conclusions: RAL re-do pyeloplasty is associated with significantly longer operative times as compared with primary pyeloplasties, especially during the exposure of the UPJ, but it is overall a safe and effective surgical modality for persistent/recurrent UPJO in children. As surgeons are increasingly asked for more accurate predictions of operative time lengths when scheduling cases, this information can be helpful for surgeons when scheduling these cases and with counseling families.
Keywords: children; laparoscopy; pyeloplasty; robotics; ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Similar articles
-
Does the use of 5 mm instruments affect the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in smaller working spaces? A comparative analysis of infants and older children.J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Dec;14(6):537.e1-537.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jul 6. J Pediatr Urol. 2018. PMID: 30007500
-
Laparoscopic In Situ Dismembered Pyeloplasty Can Facilitate Laparoscopic Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair: A Prospective Cohort Trial.J Endourol. 2018 Mar;32(3):218-222. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0538. Epub 2017 Dec 12. J Endourol. 2018. PMID: 29084479
-
Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Following Open Pyeloplasty in Children.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Oct;25(10):858-63. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0074. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015. PMID: 26488107
-
Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a single center experience and a review of the literature.BMC Urol. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01746-2. BMC Urol. 2025. PMID: 40148920 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1827-1833. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02943-z. Epub 2019 Sep 10. World J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31506749 Review.
Cited by
-
The construction of a nomogram to predict the prognosis and recurrence risks of UPJO.Front Pediatr. 2024 Apr 2;12:1376196. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1376196. eCollection 2024. Front Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 38633323 Free PMC article.
-
Real-time navigation by three-dimensional virtual reconstruction models in robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: our initial experience.Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Jan;10(1):125-133. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1006. Transl Androl Urol. 2021. PMID: 33532302 Free PMC article.
-
[Advance in re-do pyeloplasty for the management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after surgery].Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Aug 18;52(4):794-798. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.04.036. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020. PMID: 32773819 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review of the literature.J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1239-1246. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01559-1. Epub 2023 Mar 13. J Robot Surg. 2023. PMID: 36913057 Free PMC article.
-
Is secondary robotic pyeloplasty safe and effective as primary robotic pyeloplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Robot Surg. 2020 Apr;14(2):241-248. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00997-0. Epub 2019 Jul 6. J Robot Surg. 2020. PMID: 31280462
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials