Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study. II. Injury factors
- PMID: 2940708
- DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198604000-00011
Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study. II. Injury factors
Abstract
To evaluate the impact of back injury on industry, the authors conducted an extensive retrospective analysis of injuries among hourly employees of The Boeing Company, the largest industrial manufacturer in western Washington. The Boeing Company provided injury information on 31,200 employees for a 15-month period from July 1, 1979 to September 30, 1980. From this information, we analyzed 4,645 injury claims filed as of February 28, 1981 by 3,958 different employees. There were 900 back injuries in this group. Claims were categorized according to total incurred cost (TIC), made up of the medical costs and indemnity costs. High-cost claims were defined as those with a TIC greater than $10,000, and low-cost claims were those with a TIC less than $10,000. Among 857 claimants with 900 back injuries, lifting or material handling was much more commonly considered the cause of injury than accidents such as slips or falls. Accidents, however, had a much greater tendency to result in an expensive claim. The authors could not make reliable conclusions regarding injuries and 32 job skill classifications. The rate of injury did not vary according to day of the week or month, but a significantly higher rate of high-cost back injuries was noted on the day shift than on the evening or night shifts.
Similar articles
-
Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study. I. Overview and cost analysis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986 Apr;11(3):241-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198604000-00010. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986. PMID: 2940707
-
Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study. III. Employee-related factors.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986 Apr;11(3):252-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198604000-00012. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986. PMID: 2940709
-
Assessment of workers' compensation claims for back strains/sprains.J Occup Med. 1984 Jun;26(6):443-8. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198406000-00017. J Occup Med. 1984. PMID: 6234383
-
Occupational health nurses--the solution to absence management?AAOHN J. 2009 Mar;57(3):122-7. AAOHN J. 2009. PMID: 19338262 Review.
-
The Boeing prospective study and beyond.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jul 15;26(14):1613-22. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200107150-00024. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001. PMID: 11464157 Review.
Cited by
-
The reliability and validity of two new tests of maximum lifting capacity.J Occup Rehabil. 1991 Mar;1(1):13-29. doi: 10.1007/BF01073277. J Occup Rehabil. 1991. PMID: 24242323
-
Efficacy of the revised NIOSH lifting equation to predict risk of low-back pain associated with manual lifting: a one-year prospective study.Hum Factors. 2014 Feb;56(1):73-85. doi: 10.1177/0018720813513608. Hum Factors. 2014. PMID: 24669544 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of impairment related to low back pain.J Med Syst. 1993 Aug;17(3-4):253-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00996954. J Med Syst. 1993. PMID: 8254273
-
The effect of lumbar support belts on isometric force production during a simulated lift.J Occup Rehabil. 1995 Sep;5(3):131-43. doi: 10.1007/BF02109954. J Occup Rehabil. 1995. PMID: 24234659
-
Dynamic low back functional motion capacity evaluation.J Occup Rehabil. 1996 Dec;6(4):203-14. doi: 10.1007/BF02110883. J Occup Rehabil. 1996. PMID: 24235019
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical