Relative performance of antimicrobial susceptibility assays on clinical Escherichia coli isolates from animals
- PMID: 29408033
- DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.12.008
Relative performance of antimicrobial susceptibility assays on clinical Escherichia coli isolates from animals
Abstract
The assessment of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria derived from animals is often performed using the disc diffusion assay. However broth-microdilution is the preferred assay for national antimicrobial resistance surveillance programs. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of disc diffusion relative to broth-microdilution across a panel of 12 antimicrobials using data from a collection of 994 clinical Escherichia coli isolates from animals. Disc diffusion performance was evaluated by diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio pairs and receive-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Data was dichotomised using CLSI susceptible and resistant clinical breakpoints. In addition, disc diffusion breakpoints produced using diffusion Breakpoint Estimation Testing Software (dBETS) were evaluated. Analysis revealed considerable variability in performance estimates for disc diffusion susceptible and resistant breakpoints (AUC ranges: 0.78-0.99 and 0.92-1.0, respectively) across the panel of antimicrobials. Ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, and ampicillin estimates were robust across both breakpoints, whereas estimates for several antimicrobials including amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefoxitin and gentamicin were less favourable using susceptible breakpoints. Overall performance estimates were moderately improved when dBETS susceptible breakpoints were applied. For most antimicrobials, disc diffusion was accurate at predicting resistance of clinical E. coli from animals that could otherwise be determined by broth-microdilution. While disc diffusion is suboptimal for assessing the proportion of fully susceptible isolates for some drugs, sensitivity and specificity estimates provided here allow for the use of standard formula to correct this. For this reason, disc diffusion has applicability in national surveillance provided the performance of the assay is taken into account.
Keywords: Accuracy; Antimicrobial resistance; Broth-microdilution; Disc diffusion; ROC; Surveillance.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic accuracy of phenotypic assays for determining antimicrobial resistance status in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from canine clinical cases.Vet Microbiol. 2019 Jul;234:101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.05.024. Epub 2019 May 31. Vet Microbiol. 2019. PMID: 31213265
-
Comparison of ciprofloxacin and aminoglycoside susceptibility testing for ceftriaxone non-susceptible Enterobacterales by disk diffusion and VITEK 2 vs. broth microdilution using updated Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints.BMC Microbiol. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-03923-7. BMC Microbiol. 2025. PMID: 40165044 Free PMC article.
-
Intra- and inter-laboratory agreement of the disc diffusion assay for assessing antimicrobial susceptibility of porcine Escherichia coli.Prev Vet Med. 2019 Nov 15;172:104782. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104782. Epub 2019 Sep 28. Prev Vet Med. 2019. PMID: 31586718
-
Antimicrobial resistance 1979-2009 at Karolinska hospital, Sweden: normalized resistance interpretation during a 30-year follow-up on Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli resistance development.APMIS. 2010 Sep 1;118(9):621-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02660.x. APMIS. 2010. PMID: 20718714 Review.
-
Candida and candidaemia. Susceptibility and epidemiology.Dan Med J. 2013 Nov;60(11):B4698. Dan Med J. 2013. PMID: 24192246 Review.
Cited by
-
Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. isolated from Australian meat chickens remain susceptible to critically important antimicrobial agents.PLoS One. 2019 Oct 23;14(10):e0224281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224281. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31644602 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial-resistance of Escherichia coli in dogs and cats: A scoping review.PLoS One. 2025 May 30;20(5):e0323246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323246. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40445958 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical