Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May-Jun;6(3):886-894.e4.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Feb 3.

Clinician Agreement, Self-Efficacy, and Adherence with the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma

Affiliations

Clinician Agreement, Self-Efficacy, and Adherence with the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma

Michelle M Cloutier et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 May-Jun.

Abstract

Background: The 2007 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma provide evidence-based recommendations to improve asthma care. Limited national-level data are available about clinician agreement and adherence to these guidelines.

Objective: To assess clinician-reported adherence with specific guideline recommendations, as well as agreement with and self-efficacy to implement guidelines.

Methods: We analyzed 2012 National Asthma Survey of Physicians data for 1412 primary care clinicians and 233 asthma specialists about 4 cornerstone guideline domains: asthma control, patient education, environmental control, and pharmacologic treatment. Agreement and self-efficacy were measured using Likert scales; 2 overall indices of agreement and self-efficacy were compiled. Adherence was compared between primary care clinicians and asthma specialists. Logistic regression models assessed the association of agreement and self-efficacy indices with adherence.

Results: Asthma specialists expressed stronger agreement, higher self-efficacy, and greater adherence with guideline recommendations than did primary care clinicians. Adherence was low among both groups for specific core recommendations, including written asthma action plan (30.6% and 16.4%, respectively; P < .001); home peak flow monitoring, (12.8% and 11.2%; P = .34); spirometry testing (44.7% and 10.8%; P < .001); and repeated assessment of inhaler technique (39.7% and 16.8%; P < .001). Among primary care clinicians, greater self-efficacy was associated with greater adherence. For specialists, self-efficacy was associated only with increased odds of spirometry testing. Guideline agreement was generally not associated with adherence.

Conclusions: Agreement with and adherence to asthma guidelines was higher for specialists than for primary care clinicians, but was low in both groups for several key recommendations. Self-efficacy was a good predictor of guideline adherence among primary care clinicians but not among specialists.

Keywords: Adherence; Agreement; Asthma guidelines; Confidence; National Asthma Survey; Primary care; Specialist.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: No conflicts of interest for any author.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinician reported frequency of patient misunderstanding and concerns about asthma medications Note: Results for all four medication questions differ statistically significantly between primary care clinicians and allergy specialists (chi square P value<.05). * Relative standard error > 30%. Source: NCHS, National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2012.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Clinician-Reported Use of Asthma Medications, by Specialty † P Value <.05 for pairwise difference between asthma specialists and primary care. * Relative standard error > 30%. Source: NCHS, National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 2012.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health; 2007. Aug 28, 2007.
    1. Abdel-Kader K, Greer RC, Boulware LE, Unruh ML. Primary care physicians’ familiarity, beliefs, and perceived barriers to practice guidelines in non-diabetic CKD: a survey study. BMC Nephrol. 2014;15:64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aujoulat I, Jacquemin P, Rietzschel E, Scheen A, Trefois P, Wens J, et al. Factors associated with clinical inertia: an integrative review. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014;5:141–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karam M, Holland C, Yang Z, Samuels K, Sanders G. Allergen immunotherapy at university health services and allergist’s reasons for guidelines nonadherence. Allergy and asthma proceedings: the official journal of regional and state allergy societies. 2017;38(2):115–20. - PubMed
    1. Seidu S, Khunti K. Non-adherence to diabetes guidelines in primary care - the enemy of evidence-based practice. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;95(3):301–2. - PubMed

Publication types