Clinician Agreement, Self-Efficacy, and Adherence with the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma
- PMID: 29408439
- PMCID: PMC5948143
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.01.018
Clinician Agreement, Self-Efficacy, and Adherence with the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma
Abstract
Background: The 2007 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma provide evidence-based recommendations to improve asthma care. Limited national-level data are available about clinician agreement and adherence to these guidelines.
Objective: To assess clinician-reported adherence with specific guideline recommendations, as well as agreement with and self-efficacy to implement guidelines.
Methods: We analyzed 2012 National Asthma Survey of Physicians data for 1412 primary care clinicians and 233 asthma specialists about 4 cornerstone guideline domains: asthma control, patient education, environmental control, and pharmacologic treatment. Agreement and self-efficacy were measured using Likert scales; 2 overall indices of agreement and self-efficacy were compiled. Adherence was compared between primary care clinicians and asthma specialists. Logistic regression models assessed the association of agreement and self-efficacy indices with adherence.
Results: Asthma specialists expressed stronger agreement, higher self-efficacy, and greater adherence with guideline recommendations than did primary care clinicians. Adherence was low among both groups for specific core recommendations, including written asthma action plan (30.6% and 16.4%, respectively; P < .001); home peak flow monitoring, (12.8% and 11.2%; P = .34); spirometry testing (44.7% and 10.8%; P < .001); and repeated assessment of inhaler technique (39.7% and 16.8%; P < .001). Among primary care clinicians, greater self-efficacy was associated with greater adherence. For specialists, self-efficacy was associated only with increased odds of spirometry testing. Guideline agreement was generally not associated with adherence.
Conclusions: Agreement with and adherence to asthma guidelines was higher for specialists than for primary care clinicians, but was low in both groups for several key recommendations. Self-efficacy was a good predictor of guideline adherence among primary care clinicians but not among specialists.
Keywords: Adherence; Agreement; Asthma guidelines; Confidence; National Asthma Survey; Primary care; Specialist.
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: No conflicts of interest for any author.
Figures
Comment in
-
Primary Care Guideline Nonadherence: Ignorance or Reasonable Doubt?J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 May-Jun;6(3):895-896. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.02.031. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018. PMID: 29747992 No abstract available.
References
-
- National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health; 2007. Aug 28, 2007.
-
- Karam M, Holland C, Yang Z, Samuels K, Sanders G. Allergen immunotherapy at university health services and allergist’s reasons for guidelines nonadherence. Allergy and asthma proceedings: the official journal of regional and state allergy societies. 2017;38(2):115–20. - PubMed
-
- Seidu S, Khunti K. Non-adherence to diabetes guidelines in primary care - the enemy of evidence-based practice. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;95(3):301–2. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
