Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in children - long-term outcomes, how long follow up is necessary?
- PMID: 29410899
- PMCID: PMC5791399
- DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2017.1431
Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in children - long-term outcomes, how long follow up is necessary?
Abstract
Introduction: Pyeloplasty is commonly conducted in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Standard post-operational procedure involves only a short period of time after the surgery. What is the real number of complications, including those in the long-term? What is the function of the operated kidney?The aims of this study are to assess the effectiveness of pyeloplasty and to assess the suitability of conducting long term follow-up after pyeloplasty.
Material and methods: 35 of 137 patients after open pyeloplasty between 1992-2006 responded to the invitation and returned for a control appointment. The median age was 8 years (range 1 month - 19 years). In 26 kidney units the disease proceeded with symptoms and in 10 cases it proceeded without symptoms. The predominant symptom was abdominal pain (n = 21). In each child both the control ultrasound and the diuretic renal scintigraphy of the kidneys were conducted.
Results: Regression of symptoms after the operation was obtained in 19 kidney units (73%). Improvement in scintigraphy was observed in 23 kidney units (82.1%), improvement in ultrasound was obtained in 32 (91%) kidney units. Complications which required surgical intervention occurred in 4 (11.1%) patients. One patient required operative removal of a pyelostomy tube, 2 patients (11.1%) required repeated pyleoplasty (23 and 27 months after the operation), one child required nephrectomy due to nephrogenic arterial hypertension (after 4 years).
Conclusions: Statistically, there are improvements of scintigraphic function of the kidney, improvements in ultrasound examinations, and the remission of symptoms after pyeoplasty. Most complications occur within 2 years after the surgery. Long-term follow up should be continued.
Keywords: Anderson-Hynes; long term follow up; pediatric pyeloplasty; pyeloplasty; uretero-pelvic junction obstruction.
References
-
- Hsu THS, Streem SB, Nakda SY. Campbell-Walsh Urology. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2007. Management of upper urinary tract obstruction: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction; pp. 1227–1253. chapt. 38.
-
- Scardino PT, Scardino PL. Obstruction at the ureteropelvic junction; In: Bergman H, editor. The Ureter. ed 2. New York: Springer; 1981. p. 697.
-
- Bratt CG, Aurell M, Nilsson S. Renal functionin patients with hydronephrosis. Br J Urol. 1997;49:249–255. - PubMed
-
- Mikkelsen SS, Rasmussen BS, Jensen TM, Hanghoj-Petersen W, Christensen PO. Longterm follow-up of patients with hydronephrosis treated by Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. Br J Urol. 1992;79:121–124. - PubMed
-
- Arun N, Kekre ND, Nath V, Gopalakrishnan G. Is open pyeloplasty still justified? Br J Urol. 1997;80:379–381. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources