Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 7;8(1):2597.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20341-0.

Socio-ecological dynamics of Caribbean coral reef ecosystems and conservation opinion propagation

Affiliations

Socio-ecological dynamics of Caribbean coral reef ecosystems and conservation opinion propagation

Vivek A Thampi et al. Sci Rep. .

Erratum in

Abstract

The Caribbean coral reef ecosystem has experienced a long history of deterioration due to various stressors. For instance, over-fishing of parrotfish - an important grazer of macroalgae that can prevent destructive overgrowth of macroalgae - has threatened reef ecosystems in recent decades and stimulated conservation efforts such as the formation of marine protected areas. Here we develop a mathematical model of coupled socio-ecological interactions between reef dynamics and conservation opinion dynamics to better understand how natural and human factors interact individually and in combination to determine coral reef cover. We find that the coupling opinion and reef systems generates complex dynamics that are difficult to anticipate without use of a model. For instance, instead of converging to a stable state of constant coral cover and conservationist opinion, the system can oscillate between low and high live coral cover as human opinion oscillates in a boom-bust cycle between complacency and concern. Out of various possible parameter manipulations, we also find that raising awareness of coral reef endangerment best avoids counter-productive nonlinear feedbacks and always increases and stabilizes live coral reef cover. In conclusion, an improved understanding of coupled opinion-reef dynamics under anthrogenic stressors is possible using coupled socio-ecological models, and such models should be further researched.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart illustrating the basic dynamics of the coral reef ecosystem.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time series of reef-opinion dynamics at baseline parameter values, showing response of the human population to declining coral reef cover. Baseline parameter values are κ = 1.014 yr−1, J = 1.68, ϕ = 0.2. Initial conditions are M(0) = 0.3, C(0) = 0.6, P(0) = 0.2, x(0) = 0.1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time series depicting: (a) The catastrophic equilibrium with complete parrotfish eradication, where s = 0 yr1, and σ = 0.1 yr−1. (b) The catastrophic equilibrium with parrotfish survival, where s = 0 yr−1, and σ = 0.15 yr−1. (c) The unassisted macroalgae-free equilibrium, where s = 0.3 yr−1, and σ = 0.05 yr−1. (d) Oscillatory behaviour, where s = 0.2 yr−1, and σ = 0.5 yr−1. (e) Oscillatory behaviour which eventually converges to the assisted macroalgae-free equilibrium, where s = σ = 0.4 yr−1. (f) The assisted macroalgae-free equilibrium, s = 0.35 yr−1, and σ = 0.5 yr−1. All other parameters remain at baseline values.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Parameter planes depicting the model dynamical regimes under parameter variations in, (a) the parrotfish growth rate s and the maximal fishing rate σ, with all other parameters held at baseline values, (b) the social learning rate κ and the parrotfish growth rate s, with all other parameters held at baseline values, (c) the social learning rate κ and the maximal fishing rate σ, with all other parameters held at baseline values, (d) the effect of social pressure ϕ and the maximal fishing rate σ, with all other parameters held at baseline values, (e) the effect of social pressure ϕ and the parrotfish growth rate s, with all other parameters held at baseline values, and (f) the coral density sensitivity J and the maximal fishing rate σ, with all other parameters held at baseline values. *Denotes the baseline value of the parameter. See Tables 1 and 2 for the interpretation of the dynamical regimes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bellwood DR, Hughes TP, Folke C, Nyström M. Confronting the coral reef crisis. Nature. 2004;429:827–833. doi: 10.1038/nature02691. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Molles MC., Jr. Ecology: Concepts and Applications. 4th Edition. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies; 2008.
    1. Mumby PJ, Hastings A, Edwards HJ. Thresholds and the resilience of caribbean coral reefs. Nature. 2007;450:98–101. doi: 10.1038/nature06252. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gardner TA, Cote IM, Gill JA, Grant A, Watkinson AR. Hurricanes and caribbean coral reefs: impacts, recovery patterns, and role in long-term decline. Ecology. 2005;86:174–184. doi: 10.1890/04-0141. - DOI
    1. Jackson, J., Donovan, M., Cramer, K. & Lam, V. Status and trends of caribbean coral reefs: 1970–2012. Tech. Rep., Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (2014).

LinkOut - more resources