Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;10(3):174-177.
doi: 10.14740/jocmr3283w. Epub 2018 Jan 26.

Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission?

Farid Sadaka  1   2 , Amar Jadhav  1   2 , Jacklyn O'Brien  1   2 , Steven Trottier  1   2
Affiliations

Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission?

Farid Sadaka et al. J Clin Med Res. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Limited resources warrant investigating models for predicting which stroke tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) patients benefit from admission to neurologic intensive care unit (neuroICU).

Methods: This model classifies patients who on day 1 of their ICU admission are predicted to receive one or more of 30 subsequent active life supporting treatments. Two groups of patients were compared: low risk monitor (LRM) (patients who did not receive active treatment (AT) on the first day and whose risk of ever receiving active treatment was ≤ 10%) and AT (patients who received at least one treatment on any day of their ICU admission).

Results: Compared to LRM group (21 patients), AT group (59 patients) had similar age (75 ± 13 vs. 72 ± 17, P = 0.4), similar gender (male: 56% vs. 52%, P = 0.8), similar National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS, 16 ± 9 vs. 14 ± 8, P = 0.4), and higher Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III scores (62 ± 26 vs. 41 ± 15, P = 0.0008). Compared to LRM group, AT group had longer ICU length of stay (4.5 ± 4.4 vs. 2.5 ± 1.3, P = 0.04), higher ICU mortality (22% vs. 4.7% (one patient DNR/hospice); OR: 5.6; 95% CI: 0.7 - 46.0; P = 0.1), and higher hospital mortality (36% vs. 4.7%; OR: 11; 95% CI: 1.4 - 88.0; P = 0.02).

Conclusion: The outcome of LRM patients with stroke post-tPA suggests that they may not require admission to a formal neuroICU, improving resource use and reducing costs.

Keywords: Ischemic stroke; Neurologic intensive care unit; Stroke; Utilization review; tPA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Outcome comparisons between the low risk monitor (LRM) and active treatment (AT) groups.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Demaerschalk BM, Kleindorfer DO, Adeoye OM, Demchuk AM, Fugate JE, Grotta JC, Khalessi AA. et al. Scientific rationale for the inclusion and exclusion criteria for intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47(2):581–641. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000086. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen LM, Kennedy EH, Sales A, Hofer TP. Use of health IT for higher-value critical care. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(7):594–597. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1213273. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sinuff T, Kahnamoui K, Cook DJ, Luce JM, Levy MM. Values Ethics and Rationing in Critical Care Task Force. Rationing critical care beds: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(7):1588–1597. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000130175.38521.9F. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA. A model for identifying patients who may not need intensive care unit admission. J Crit Care. 2010;25(2):205–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.06.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS, Malila FM. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today’s critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(5):1297–1310. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215112.84523.F0. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources