Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;10(3):247-253.
doi: 10.14740/jocmr3320w. Epub 2018 Jan 26.

Predicting Difficult Intubation in Emergency Department by Intubation Assessment Score

Affiliations

Predicting Difficult Intubation in Emergency Department by Intubation Assessment Score

Winchana Srivilaithon et al. J Clin Med Res. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The difficult intubation is associated with failure of emergency tracheal intubation. This study aimed to develop and validate a model for predicting difficult intubation in emergency department (ED).

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the ED. We collected data from all consecutive adult patients who underwent emergency tracheal intubation. Patients were excluded if they were intubated by low experience intubator. The difficult intubation was defined by grade III or IV of Cormack and Lehane classification. We used multivariable regression model to identify significant predictors of difficult intubation and weighted points proportional to the beta coefficient values. The ability to discriminate was quantified by using the area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AuROC). The bootstrapping method was used to validate the performance.

Results: A total of 1,212 intubations were analyzed. One hundred and fifty-seven intubations were enrolled in difficult intubation group. Five independence predictors were identified, and each was assigned a number of points proportional to its beta coefficient: male gender (one), large tongue (two), limit mouth opening (two), poor neck mobility (two), and presence of obstructed airway (three). Intubation assessment score model was created and applied to all subjects. The AuROC was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77 - 0.85) for the development dataset, and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.76 - 0.85) for the validation dataset. We defined three risk groups: low risk (zero to one points), intermediate risk (two to three points), and high risk (above three points), and the difficult intubation rate was 4.7%, 22.5%, and 53.6%, respectively.

Conclusions: Intubation assessment score model was constructed from patients' simple characteristics and performed well in predicting difficult intubation and can discriminate between with and without difficult intubation.

Keywords: Airway assessment; Difficult intubation; Difficult intubation indicator; Emergency department intubation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the study patients enrolled. ED: emergency department.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Discrimination power of the score in the development dataset. AuROC: area under receiver operating characteristic curve; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

References

    1. Orebaugh SL. Difficult airway management in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2002;22(1):31–48. doi: 10.1016/S0736-4679(01)00435-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hagiwara Y, Watase H, Okamoto H, Goto T, Hasegawa K. Japanese Emergency Medicine Network Investigators. Prospective validation of the modified LEMON criteria to predict difficult intubation in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(10):1492–1496. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.06.038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duchynski R, Brauer K, Hutton K, Jones S, Rosen P. The quick look airway classification. A useful tool in predicting the difficult out-of-hospital intubation: experience in an air medical transport program. Air Med J. 1998;17(2):46–50. doi: 10.1016/S1067-991X(98)90019-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hasegawa K, Shigemitsu K, Hagiwara Y, Chiba T, Watase H, Brown CA 3rd, Brown DF. et al. Association between repeated intubation attempts and adverse events in emergency departments: an analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(6):749–754. e742. - PubMed
    1. Kim C, Kang H, Lim T. et al. What factors affect the success rate of the first attempt at endotracheal intubation in emergency departments? Emerg Med J. 2013;30:88–92. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201708. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources