Barriers to Adherence in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Multicenter Collaborative Experience and Preliminary Results
- PMID: 29419467
- PMCID: PMC5932234
- DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.171087
Barriers to Adherence in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Multicenter Collaborative Experience and Preliminary Results
Abstract
Objective: Nonadherence is currently an underrecognized and potentially modifiable obstacle to care in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The purpose of our study was to design and implement a standardized approach to identifying adherence barriers for youth with JIA across 7 pediatric rheumatology clinics through the Pediatric Rheumatology Care and Outcomes Improvement Network (PR-COIN) and to assess the frequency of adherence barriers in patients and their caregivers across treatment modalities.
Methods: An iterative process using coproduction among parents and providers of patients with JIA was used to design the Barriers Assessment Tool to screen for adherence barriers across 4 treatment modalities (i.e., oral medications, injectable medications, infusions, and physical/occupational therapy). This tool was implemented in 7 rheumatology clinics across the United States and patient responses were collected for analysis.
Results: Data were collected from 578 parents and 99 patients (n = 44 parent-child dyads). Seventy-seven percent (n = 444) of caregivers and 70% (n = 69) of patients reported at least 1 adherence barrier across all treatment components. The most commonly reported adherence barriers included worry about future consequences of therapy, pain, forgetting, side effects, and embarrassment related to the therapy. There was no significant difference between endorsement of barriers between parents and adolescents.
Conclusion: Implementing a standardized tool assessing adherence barriers in the JIA population across multiple clinical settings is feasible. Systematic screening sheds light on the factors that make adherence difficult in JIA and identifies targets for future adherence interventions in clinical practice.
Keywords: JUVENILE ARTHRITIS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no other financial supports or other benefits from commercial sources for the work reported in this manuscript. There are no financial interests or disclosures to report on behalf of any of the listed authors that would create a conflict of interest or the appearance of conflict of interest with regard to the work.
Figures


Comment in
-
Assessing Barriers to Therapeutic Regimens for Young People with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.J Rheumatol. 2018 May;45(5):588-589. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.171399. J Rheumatol. 2018. PMID: 29717093 No abstract available.
References
-
- Petty RE, Cassidy JT. Texbook of Pediatric Rheumatology. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011. Textbook of Pediatric Rheumatology; pp. 262–271.
-
- De Benedetti F, Brunner HI, Ruperto N, Kenwright A, Wright S, Calvo I, et al. Randomized Trial of Tocilizumab in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2385–2395. - PubMed
-
- Lovell DJ, Reiff A, Jones OY, Schneider R, Nocton J, Stein LD, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of etanercept in children with polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1987–1994. - PubMed
-
- Lovell DJ, Ruperto N, Goodman S, Reiff A, Jung L, Jarosova K, et al. Adalimumab with or without methotrexate in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:810–820. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials