Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;5(1):54-61.
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 13.

Incorporation of Urinary Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 and TMPRSS2:ERG into Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator

Affiliations

Incorporation of Urinary Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 and TMPRSS2:ERG into Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator

Donna P Ankerst et al. Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator (PCPTRC) is a commonly used risk tool for predicting the outcome on biopsy based on the established risk factors.

Objective: To determine whether incorporation of the novel urinary markers prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) and TMPRSS2:ERG (T2:ERG) into the PCPTRC improves its discrimination, accuracy, and clinical net benefit.

Design, setting, and participants: Since PCA3 and T2:ERG were not measured as part of the PCPTRC, a Bayesian modeling approach was used to combine data where the markers were measured in a Michigan cohort with the PCPTRC as prior probabilities to form an updated PCPTRC. This update was compared to the existing PCPTRC on an independent Early Detection Research Network cohort in terms of discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis.

Results and limitations: Among the 1225 Michigan biopsies, 57.7%, 24.0%, and 18.3% were negative, with low- and high-grade (Gleason grade≥7) prostate cancer, respectively. Evaluated on the Early Detection Research Network validation set comprising 854 biopsies, areas under the curve (95% confidence interval) for predicting high-grade cancer in the 854 biopsies comprising the validation set were 70.0% (66.0-74.0%), 76.4% (72.8-80.0%), and 77.1% (73.6-80.6%) for the PCPTRC alone, with PCA3 added, and PCA3 and T2:ERG added, respectively. Net benefit was improved for the updated PCPTRC, while calibration was not. Limitations are that the updated PCPTRC is based on two different cohorts, the PCPT and Michigan, and that 20% of the validation set came from the Michigan center. More validation is required; hence, the updated risk tool is posted online.

Conclusions: Incorporation of PCA3 into the PCPTRC improved validation on an independent cohort, whereas T2:ERG offered negligible utility in addition to PCA3.

Patient summary: After passing external validation, prostate cancer antigen 3 has been added to the online Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator for use by patients in deciding whether to proceed to biopsy. TMPRSS2:ERG did not improve prediction on the external validation set, but is included for further validation.

Keywords: PCA3; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific antigen; T2:ERG.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Risk of risk of high-grade prostate cancer detection within the context of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator (PCPTR) for various prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels for a 55-yr-old Caucasian man with no previous biopsy, normal rectal examination, and no family history: (A) according to prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) and (B) according to TMPRSS2:ERG (T2:ERG) for a PCA3 value of 24. The updated risk tool is available at myprostatecancerrisk.com.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Receiver operating characteristic curves for the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator (PCPTRC) for high-grade disease risk, PCPTRC with prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3), and PCPTRC with PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG (T2:ERG) evaluated on the external validation set. AUC = area under the curve.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Calibration plots for the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator (PCPTRC) for high-grade disease risk, PCPTRC with prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3), and PCPTRC with PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG (T2:ERG) evaluated on the external validation set.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Decision curves for the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator (PCPTRC) for high-grade disease risk, PCPTRC with prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3), PCPTRC with PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG (T2:ERG) compared with a program that would refer all patients to biopsy to none (no) evaluated on the external validation set.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thompson IM, Ankerst DP, Chi C, et al. Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:529–34. - PubMed
    1. Ankerst DP, Boeck A, Freedland SJ, et al. Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group. World J Urol. 2012;30:181–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Auffenberg GB, Merdan S, Miller DC, et al. Evaluation of prostate cancer risk calculators for shared decision making across diverse urology practices in Michigan. Urology. 2017;104:137–42. - PubMed
    1. Poyet C, Nieboer D, Bhindi B, et al. Prostate cancer risk prediction using the novel versions of the European Randomised Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) risk calculators: independent validation and comparison in a contemporary European cohort. BJU Int. 2016;117:401–8. - PubMed
    1. Ankerst DP, Hoefler J, Bock S, et al. Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator 2.0 for the prediction of low- vs high-grade prostate cancer. Urology. 2014;83:1362–7. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types