Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 8;8(1):2620.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20947-4.

The model of circulating immune complexes and interleukin-6 improves the prediction of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus

Affiliations

The model of circulating immune complexes and interleukin-6 improves the prediction of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus

Chokchai Thanadetsuntorn et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease resulting in autoantibody production, immune complex deposition, and complement activation. The standard biomarkers such as anti-dsDNA and complements (C3 and C4) do not always correlate with active clinical SLE. The heterogeneity of SLE patients may require additional biomarkers to designate disease activity. Ninety SLE patients participated in this study. Evaluation of disease activity was achieved with the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and modified SLEDAI-2K. The measured serum biomarkers were anti-dsDNA, C3, C4, ESR, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and circulating immune complexes (CIC). IL-6, ESR and CIC significantly increased in active clinical SLE. Complement, anti-dsDNA, ESR and CIC correlated with SLEDAI-2K while only anti-dsDNA, CIC, ESR and IL-6 correlated with modified SLEDAI-2K. A combination of biomarkers gave a higher odds ratio (OR) than any single biomarker. A combination of IL-6 or CIC exhibited the highest OR (OR = 7.27, 95%CI (1.99-26.63), p = 0.003) while either complement or anti-dsDNA showed a moderate odds ratio (OR = 3.14, 95%CI (1.16-8.48), p = 0.024) of predicting clinical active SLE. The combination of CIC and IL-6 strongly predicts active clinical SLE. CIC and IL-6 can be used in addition to standard biomarkers to determine SLE activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

PP is currently receiving grants from the Thailand Research Fund (#RSA5980023 and IRN), National Research Council of Thailand and Ramathibodi Research Development Fund. Kenneth Hodge is supported by Rachadaphiseksompot Fund for Postdoctoral Fellowship, Chulalongkorn University. The remaining authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under ROC curve of the following biomarkers; (a) Complement 3 (C3); (b) Complement 4 (C4); (c) anti-dsDNA; (d) Interleukin-6 (IL-6); (e) Circulating immune complex (CIC); (f) Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).

References

    1. Rahman A, Isenberg DA. Systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:929–939. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra071297. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Herrmann M, Voll RE, Kalden JR. Etiopathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunol Today. 2000;21:424–426. doi: 10.1016/S0167-5699(00)01675-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jacob N, Stohl W. Cytokine disturbances in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13:228. doi: 10.1186/ar3349. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petri M. Hopkins Lupus Cohort. 1999 update. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2000;26:199–213, v. doi: 10.1016/S0889-857X(05)70135-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Furie R, Toder K, Zapantis E. Lessons Learned From the Clinical Trials of Novel Biologics and Small Molecules in Lupus Nephritis. Semin Nephrol. 2015;35:509–520. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2015.08.012. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources