Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 20:3:17100.
doi: 10.1038/s41394-017-0025-8. eCollection 2017.

Pulse article: Survey on the current usage of the International Standards for the Assessment of Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI)

Affiliations

Pulse article: Survey on the current usage of the International Standards for the Assessment of Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI)

Marcalee Alexander et al. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. .

Abstract

Study design: Online questionnaire.

Objectives: To identify the awareness, and current use, of the International Standards for the Assessment of Autonomic Function after SCI (ISAFSCI) and suggest necessary revisions.

Setting: An international collaboration of committee members.

Methods: A survey was drafted and consensus achieved among members of the International Standards Committee of the ASIA. The questionnaire was posted on SurveyMonkey for 2 months. A survey link was posted on the ASIA and ISCoS websites, and committee members circulated the survey to colleagues with the goal of obtaining a wide-spread international response.

Results: A total of 173 providers responded. About half (n = 84) of the respondents used the standards in some form. Forty-four percent (n = 72) felt they knew the difference between the standards and the data sets. Among 135 responses on the usefulness of the ISAFSCI, the bladder, bowel, and sexual function sections, and the heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and sudomotor sections for use in patients with tetraplegia were reported as most useful. Comments revealed that respondents would like more explanation regarding specific definitions of components of the standards, how/when to use the ISAFSCI, and how the ISAFSCI may assist in clinical care.

Conclusion: The ISAFSCI is used by a subset of SCI clinicians. Some find the standards useful, while others are unaware of the utility of the ISAFSCI to prevent morbidity and assist in documentation of autonomic recovery post SCI. Further clarification regarding the definition of various disorders, and how and why to use the ISAFSCI in the SCI population, is needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standardsThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Alexander MS, Biering-Sorensen F, Bodner D, Brackett NL, Cardenas, Charlifue S, et al. International standards to document remaining autonomic function after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2009;47:36–43. doi: 10.1038/sc.2008.121. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krassioukov A, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Kennelly M, Kirshblum S, Krogh K, et al. , International standards to document remaining autonomic function after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35:201–10. doi: 10.1179/1079026812Z.00000000053. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Spinal Injury Association. International Standards to document remaining autonomic function after spinal cord injury. Atlanta, GA; 2012. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Graves DE, Jha A, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011) . J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34:535–46. doi: 10.1179/204577211X13207446293695. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Spinal Injury Association. ASIA Learning Center. 2017. http://www.asiaspinalinjury.org/elearning/elearning.php. Accessed on 6 July 2017.

LinkOut - more resources