Time Costs for Genetic Counseling in Preconception Carrier Screening with Genome Sequencing
- PMID: 29423569
- PMCID: PMC6061093
- DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0205-5
Time Costs for Genetic Counseling in Preconception Carrier Screening with Genome Sequencing
Abstract
Advances in technology and the promise of personalized health care are driving greater use of genome sequencing (GS) for a variety of clinical scenarios. As health systems consider adopting GS, they need to understand the impact of GS on the organization and cost of care. While research has documented a dramatic decrease in the cost of sequencing and interpreting GS, few studies have examined how GS impacts genetic counseling workloads. This study examined the time needed to provide genetic counseling for GS in the context of preconception carrier screening. Genetic counselors prospectively reported on the time spent in the results disclosure process with 107 study participants who were part of the NextGen study. We found that the median time for results disclosure was 64 min (ranged from 5 to 229 min). Preparation work was the most time-consuming activity. Qualitative data from journal entries, debrief interviews with genetic counselors, and detailed case conference notes provided information on factors influencing time for results disclosure and implications for practice. Results suggest that expanded carrier screening could require significant increases in genetic counseling time, unless we are able to generate new resources to reduce preparation work or develop other strategies such as the creation of new models to deliver this type of service.
Keywords: Carrier testing; Genetic counseling; Mixed methods; Preconception; Time study; Whole genome sequencing.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest
Frances L. Lynch, Patricia Himes, Marian J. Gilmore, Elissa M. Morris, Tia L. Kauffman, Elizabeth Shuster, Benjamin S. Wilfond, Jacob A. Reiss, John F. Dickerson, Michael C. Leo, Jennifer Schneider, James V. Davis, Carmit K. McMullen, and Katrina A.B. Goddard declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human Studies and Informed Consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Animal Studies
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
Figures
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials