Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Apr;118(4):729-736.
doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3821-3. Epub 2018 Feb 9.

Opinion paper: scientific, philosophical and legal consideration of doping in sports

Affiliations
Review

Opinion paper: scientific, philosophical and legal consideration of doping in sports

Massimo Negro et al. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

The term doping is generally used to indicate practices based on the use of performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) or the abuse of medical therapies. Mostly analysed by doctors and officials, doping nevertheless also requires a philosophical consideration to avoid being simplistically portrayed as an isolated practice. To do this, we need to pay attention to the contradictions and paradoxes in the modern approach to doping in sport. In this context, doping is not only relevant to the health of an individual involved in the violation of World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) criteria, but it actually represents a double-edged phenomenon containing ethical and legal points of view. Several philosophical items affect the ethics of doping. While, indeed, through a deontological vision it is easy to morally condemn an athlete who takes the decision to turn to doping, the same condemnation becomes difficult when the practice of doping is compared with the strong social demand of winners in every field of life. This point must be considered to prevent doping from becoming accepted as a daily practice to excel at all costs and regarded not only as normal but as a necessity for those participating in sport at both an amateur and professional level. Furthermore, a complete discussion on doping has to consider not only the philosophy of performance-enhancing drug abuse, but also the widespread practice of an inappropriate and excessive intake of certain dietary supplements with the unique and obsessive purpose (similar to doping) of increasing physical or mental performance. Based on the above, the aim of this paper is to provide a critical opinion of the doping problem and its related practices and analyze possible solutions considering issues that go beyond the impact of doping on health and reflect on whether it is right or not that an athlete does all he can to improve his performance.

Keywords: Enhancement; Ethics; Philosophical ethics; Sports doping.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. JAMA. 2006 Oct 18;296(15):1858-66 - PubMed
    1. Pharmacol Res. 2016 Dec;114:295-296 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 2;366(5):389-91 - PubMed
    1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Dec;1093:321-38 - PubMed
    1. Harm Reduct J. 2015 Nov 10;12:53 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances