Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;66(4):706-713.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.15273. Epub 2018 Feb 10.

36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Versus Gait Speed As Predictor of Preclinical Mobility Disability in Older Women: The Women's Health Initiative

Affiliations

36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Versus Gait Speed As Predictor of Preclinical Mobility Disability in Older Women: The Women's Health Initiative

Deepika R Laddu et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the value of clinically measured gait speed with that of the self-reported Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Survey Physical Function Index (SF-36 PF) in predicting future preclinical mobility disability (PCMD) in older women.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Forty clinical centers in the United States.

Participants: Women aged 65 to 79 enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative Clinical Trials with gait speed and SF-36 assessed at baseline (1993-1998) and follow-up Years 1, 3, and 6 (N = 3,587).

Measurements: Women were categorized as nondecliners or decliners based on changes (from baseline to Year 1) in gait speed and SF-36 PF scores. Logistic regression models were used to estimate incident PCMD (gait speed <1.0 m/s) at Years 3 and 6. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to compare the predictive value of SF-36 PF with that of measured gait speed.

Results: Slower baseline gait speed and lower SF-36 PF scores were associated with higher adjusted odds of PCMD at Years 3 and 6 (all P < .001). For gait speed, decliners were 2.59 times as likely to have developed PCMD as nondecliners by Year 3 and 2.35 times as likely by Year 6. Likewise, for SF-36, decliners were 1.42 times as likely to have developed PCMD by Year 3 and 1.49 times as likely by Year 6. Baseline gait speed (AUC = 0.713) was nonsignificantly better than SF-36 (AUC = 0.705) at predicting PCMD over 6 years (P = .21); including measures at a second time point significantly improved model discrimination for predicting PCMD (all P < .001).

Conclusion: Gait speed identified PCMD risk in older women better than the SF-36 PF did, although the results may be limited given that gait speed served as a predictor and to define the PCMD outcome. Nonetheless, monitoring trajectories of change in mobility are better predictors of future mobility disability than single measures.

Keywords: disability; geriatric assessment; performance; physical function; prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest and have no financial disclosures to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for predicting new preclinical mobility disability at Year 3 according to physical function measured at baseline only (gray) or baseline plus 1 year (black). Gait speed, test for difference in ROC curves, P<.001. Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Physical Function Index, test for difference in ROC curves; P=.005.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for predicting new preclinical mobility disability at Year 6 according to physical function measured at baseline only (gray) or baseline plus 1 year (black). Gait speed, test for difference in ROC curves; P<.001. Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Physical Function Index, test for difference in ROC curves; P=.004.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fried LP, Bandeen-Roche K, Chaves PH, Johnson BA. Preclinical mobility disability predicts incident mobility disability in older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55A:M43–M52. - PubMed
    1. Studenski S, Perera S, Wallace D, et al. Physical performance measures in the clinical setting. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:314–322. - PubMed
    1. Onder G, Penninx BW, Lapuerta P, et al. Change in physical performance over time in older women: The Women’s Health and Aging Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57A:M289–M293. - PubMed
    1. Rosso AL, Lee BK, Stefanick ML, et al. Caregiving frequency and physical function: The Women’s Health Initiative. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015;70A:210–215. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, et al. Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: Consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the Short Physical Performance Battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55A:M221–M231. - PubMed

Publication types