Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2018 Jan-Mar;18(1):76-81.
doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_136_17.

Prosthetic rehabilitation in neurosurgical cranioplasty

Affiliations
Case Reports

Prosthetic rehabilitation in neurosurgical cranioplasty

Thara Maria Joseph et al. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

The defects of the skull cause mechanical vulnerability of the brain, esthetic disfigurement, and transmission of vibrations and pulsation of the brain. Subsequent cranioplasty may be required to compensate for the defect and to alleviate various signs and symptoms. When long-term outcome of biomaterial use in pediatric cases is limited, alloplastic cranioplasty in adults are supported by several large case series. This case report narrates cranioplasty using titanium alloplastic implant material.

Keywords: Cranioplasty; prosthesis; reconstruction; titanium implants; trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preoperative photographs showing left cranial bone defect (frontal view)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preoperative photographs (lateral view)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Computed tomography with skull defect
Figure 4
Figure 4
Impression of the defect
Figure 5
Figure 5
Retrieved cast
Figure 6
Figure 6
Wax pattern of the defect
Figure 7
Figure 7
Extracranial tryin of titanium plate
Figure 8
Figure 8
Neurosurgical procedure
Figure 9
Figure 9
Neurosurgical procedure showing titanium implant in position
Figure 10
Figure 10
Sutures placed
Figure 11
Figure 11
Postoperative view showing excellent adaptation and symmetry
Figure 12
Figure 12
Postoperative aerial view
Figure 13
Figure 13
Follow-up 8 months
Figure 14
Figure 14
Follow-up 8 months
Figure 15
Figure 15
Computed tomography scan after 10 months

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pavaiya A, Tyagi VK, Tripathi A, Singh SV, Chand P. Cranioplasty with alloplastic cranial implant. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2009;9:109–11.
    1. Ebrahimi A, Nejadsarvari N, Rasouli HR, Ebrahimi A. Warfare-related secondary anterior cranioplasty. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2016;6:58–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goiato MC, Pesqueira AA, dos Santos DM, Antenucci RM, Ribeiro Pdo P. Evaluation of dimensional change and detail reproduction in silico nes for facial prostheses. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2008;21:85–8. - PubMed
    1. Punchak M, Chung LK, Lagman C, Bui TT, Lazareff J, Rezzadeh K, et al. Outcomes following polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cranioplasty: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;41:30–5. - PubMed
    1. Alqutaibi AY. Materials of facial prosthesis: History and advances. Int J Contemp Dent Med Rev. 2015;2015:4.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources