Effect of Endometrial Cavity Fluid On Pregnancy Rate of Fresh Versus Frozen In Vitro Fertilization Cycle
- PMID: 29430156
- PMCID: PMC5799933
- DOI: 10.4103/0974-1208.223282
Effect of Endometrial Cavity Fluid On Pregnancy Rate of Fresh Versus Frozen In Vitro Fertilization Cycle
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to study the difference in etiology and outcome in terms of implantation rate and abortion rate in fresh (self-stimulated) versus frozen (oocyte donation cycle) in vitro fertilization (IVF) and in transient versus persistent fluid.
Material and methods: This retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Reproductive Medicine of tertiary care center from January 2012 to November 2015. Data were collected retrospectively from the departmental files. Twenty-four patients from fresh IVF-stimulated cycles and 24 from frozen oocyte donation cycle with their endometrium prepared by hormone replacement treatment were included in the study. All patients selected in the study had grade-A embryo transfer of day 3-4 with maximum three embryo transferred. Pregnancy was defined by rising serum beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin levels performed after 14 days of embryo transfer and further confirmed by ultrasonographic visualization of gestational sac at 6 weeks. All biochemical pregnancies were included in implantation failure. All pregnant patients were followed till the termination of pregnancy and further noted as live birth or abortion.
Results: Clinical pregnancy rate was seen more in self-stimulated cycle (62.5%) with live birth rate of 50% than hormone replacement treatment cycle, in which clinical pregnancy rate was 45.83% with live birth rate of 33.33%. Clinical pregnancy rate was highest in group with very less fluid in cavity (1-2 mm) 63% and with live birth of 52.63%. Clinical pregnancy was seen only in two patients of group B with anterior and posterior (AP) diameter of fluid in cavity of 2-3 mm with live birth of only one, whereas in group C, with AP diameter of 3-5 mm, none of the patient conceived. This difference was statistically significant. Clinical pregnancy rate was 65.62% in transient fluid accumulation with live birth rate of 53.25%, which was significantly higher than persistent fluid accumulation (P value - 0.0337 for pregnancy rate and 0.0312 for live birth rate).
Conclusion: Fluid accumulation seen in fresh cycles are generally associated with better outcome because it may be associated with good prognostic factors - small AP diameter of fluid, with transient fluid accumulation and more with poly cystic ovarian syndrome as an etiological factor; however, in frozen cycle, it can be associated with poor outcome.
Keywords: Endometrial cavity; frozen IVF cycle; pregnancy; self-stimulated in vitro fertilization.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Speroff L, Frintz MA. Female infertility. Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. p. 1013.p. 67.
-
- Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1999 results generated from the American Society for reproductive medicine/society for assisted reproductive technology registry. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:918–31. - PubMed
-
- Herrler A, von Rango U, Beier HM. Embryo-maternal signalling: How the embryo starts talking to its mother to accomplish implantation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;6:244–56. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources