Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017:2017:6938718.
doi: 10.1155/2017/6938718. Epub 2017 Dec 21.

Pre- and Postintervention Factor Structure of Functional Independence Measure in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury

Affiliations

Pre- and Postintervention Factor Structure of Functional Independence Measure in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury

Mikhail Saltychev et al. Rehabil Res Pract. 2017.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the factor structure of Functional Independence Measure (FIM®) scale amongst people with spinal cord injury (SCI).

Methods: This was a retrospective, register-based cohort study on 155 rehabilitants with SCI. FIM was assessed at the beginning and at the end of multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation. The internal consistency of the FIM was assessed with Cronbach's alpha and exploratory factor analysis was employed to approximate the construct structure of FIM.

Results: The internal consistency demonstrated high Cronbach's alpha of 0.95 to 0.96. For both pre- and postintervention assessments, the exploratory factor analysis resulted in 3-factor structures. Except for two items ("walking or using a wheelchair" and "expression"), the structures of the identified three factors remained the same from the beginning to the end of rehabilitation. The loadings of all items were sufficient, exceeding 0.3. Both pre- and postintervention chi-square tests showed significant p values < 0.0001. The "motor" domain was divided into two factors with this 2-factor structure enduring through the intervention period.

Conclusions: Amongst rehabilitants with SCI, FIM failed to demonstrate unidimensionality. Instead, it showed a 3-factor structure that fluctuated only little depending on the timing of measurement. Additionally, when measured separately, also motor score was 2-dimensional, not 1-dimensional. Using a total or subscale FIM, scores seem to be unjustified in the studied population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Scree plots of exploratory factor analysis of FIM total score at the beginning and at the end of the rehabilitation course. (b) Scree plots of exploratory factor analysis of FIM motor score at the beginning and at the end of the rehabilitation course.

References

    1. Torres A. Capturing Functional Independence Measure (FIM. Rehabilitation Nursing. 2016 doi: 10.1002/rnj.284. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dubost J.-J., Fis I., Denis P., et al. Polyarticular septic arthritis. Medicine. 1993;72(5):296–310. doi: 10.1097/00005792-199309000-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marino R. J., Huang M., Knight P., Herbison G. J., Ditunno J. F., Segal M. Assessing selfcare status in quadriplegia: Comparison of the quadriplegia index of function (QIF) and the functional independence measure (FIM) Paraplegia. 1993;31(4):225–233. doi: 10.1038/sc.1993.41. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Segal M. E., Ditunno J. F., Staas W. Interinstitutional agreement of individual functional independence measure (Fim) items measured at two sites on one sample of sci patients. Paraplegia. 1993;31(10):622–631. doi: 10.1038/sc.1993.101. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cavanagh S. J., Hogan K., Gordon V., Fairfax J. Stroke-specific FIM models in an urban population. The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing : Journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses. 2000;32(1):17–21. doi: 10.1097/01376517-200002000-00006. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources