Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018;70(1):65-71.
doi: 10.3138/ptc.2016-98.

Smoking-Related Stigma Expressed by Physiotherapists toward Individuals with Lung Disease

Affiliations

Smoking-Related Stigma Expressed by Physiotherapists toward Individuals with Lung Disease

Bethany Bass et al. Physiother Can. 2018.

Abstract

Purpose: We determined the extent and nature of stigma exhibited by a sample of Canadian cardiorespiratory physiotherapists toward people with lung disease who had a smoking history. Method: A quantitative online survey was distributed to Canadian cardiorespiratory physiotherapists, and an anti-smoking attitudes questionnaire was used to measure explicit stigma. We used two case studies with questions to measure implicit stigma. The first involved a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and a smoking history, and the second described a patient with COPD with no smoking history. Results: Of the respondents (n=50), 56% demonstrated mild explicit stigma and 44% demonstrated moderate to severe explicit stigma. The extent of explicit stigma was not associated with respondents' age, area of practice, personal smoking history, or family history of lung disease resulting from smoking. The results indicated no evidence of implicit stigma, and no significant differences were found between the participants' prospective treatments and their professional attitudes toward patient cases. Conclusions: Canadian cardiorespiratory physiotherapists demonstrated explicit stigma toward people with lung disease with a significant smoking history, but there was no evidence of implicit stigma. These findings suggest that further research is needed to investigate how stigma held by cardiorespiratory physiotherapists may affect the quality of care provided for patients with a smoking history.

Objectif : déterminer l'étendue et la nature de la réprobation dont fait preuve un échantillon de physiothérapeutes cardiorespiratoires canadiens envers les fumeurs atteints d'une maladie pulmonaire. Méthodologie : les physiothérapeutes cardiorespiratoires canadiens ont reçu un sondage quantitatif en ligne. Ils ont répondu à un questionnaire sur les attitudes négatives envers le tabagisme pour mesurer leur réprobation explicite. Deux études de cas accompagnées de questions mesuraient leur réprobation implicite. La première portait sur un patient fumeur atteint d'une maladie pulmonaire obstructive chronique (MPOC) et la deuxième, sur un patient non-fumeur atteint d'une MPOC. Résultats : au total, 56 % des 50 répondants ont démontré une légère réprobation explicite et 44 %, une réprobation explicite modérée à importante. L'étendue de leur réprobation explicite n'était pas associée à leur âge, à leur région de pratique, à leur propre tabagisme, ni à une histoire familiale de maladie pulmonaire causée par le tabagisme. Les résultats ne faisaient état d'aucune réprobation implicite, et il n'y avait pas de différence significative entre les traitements prospectifs des répondants et leur attitude professionnelle envers les cas des patients. Conclusions : les physiothérapeutes cardiorespiratoires canadiens faisaient preuve d'une réprobation explicite envers les fumeurs atteints d'une maladie pulmonaire, sans toutefois démontrer de réprobation implicite. Selon ces résultats, d'autres recherches s'imposent pour évaluer si la réprobation des physiothérapeutes cardiorespiratoires nuit à la qualité des soins aux patients fumeurs.

Keywords: cardiorespiratory physiotherapy; lung diseases; smoking; stigmatization; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of survey.

References

    1. Rehm J, Baliunas D, Brochu S, et al. . The costs of substance abuse in Canada 2002. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse; 2006.
    1. Ruano-Ravina A, Figueiras A, Barros-Dios JM. Lung cancer and related risk factors: an update of the literature. Public Health. 2003;117(3):149–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3506(02)00023-9. Medline:12825464 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ng M, Freeman MK, Fleming TD, et al. . Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980-2012. JAMA. 2014;311(2):183–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.284692. Medline:24399557 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bell K, Salmon A, Bowers M, et al. . Smoking, stigma and tobacco “denormalization”: Further reflections on the use of stigma as a public health tool. A commentary on Social Science & Medicine's Stigma, Prejudice, Discrimination and Health Special Issue (67: 3). Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(6):795–9, discussion 800–1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.060. Medline:20044187 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goffman E. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1963.

LinkOut - more resources