Efficacy and safety of a novel high-dose mesalazine tablet in mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial
- PMID: 29435324
- PMCID: PMC5802664
- DOI: 10.1177/2050640617703842
Efficacy and safety of a novel high-dose mesalazine tablet in mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial
Abstract
Background: Adherence to mesalazine treatment is essential for the successful treatment of ulcerative colitis.
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety and preference of a novel high-dose 1000 mg mesalazine tablet versus conventional treatment for ulcerative colitis remission.
Methods: This pivotal phase III trial compared one 1000 mg mesalazine tablet (M1000 group) versus two registered 500 mg mesalazine tablets (M2x500 group), both taken three times daily, in patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis. The primary efficacy variable was clinical remission at week 8.
Results: A total of 306 patients were considered for intent-to-treat analysis. Clinical remission was achieved in 45.0% of the patients in the M1000 group versus 41.9% in the M2x500 group (P < 0.001 for non-inferiority). Mucosal healing was achieved by 68.9% of the patients in the M1000 group and 68.4% in the M2x500 group. The majority of patients preferred the intake of one high-dose tablet (47.7%) over two low-dose tablets (10.5%). Oral treatment with high-dose 1000 mg mesalazine tablets was well tolerated without new safety signals.
Conclusions: The novel high-dose 1000 mg mesalazine tablet is effective, non-inferior to the registered 500 mg mesalazine tablet, and safe for ulcerative colitis treatment. It was preferred by a majority of patients and may improve ulcerative colitis treatment adherence.
Keywords: Mesalazine; adherence; efficacy; randomised; ulcerative colitis.
Figures
References
-
- Cohen RD, Woseth DM, Thisted RA, et al. A meta-analysis and overview of the literature on treatment options for left-sided ulcerative colitis and ulcerative proctitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 1263–1276. - PubMed
-
- Gibson PR, Vaizey C, Black CM, et al. Relationship between disease severity and quality of life and assessment of health care utilization and cost for ulcerative colitis in Australia: a cross-sectional, observational study. J Crohns Colitis 2014; 8: 598–606. - PubMed
-
- Theede K, Kiszka-Kanowitz M, Nordgaard-Lassen I, et al. The impact of endoscopic inflammation and mucosal healing on health-related quality of life in ulcerative colitis patients. J Crohns Colitis 2015; 9: 625–632. - PubMed
-
- Dignass A, Lindsay JO, Sturm A, et al. Second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis. Part 2: Current management. J Crohns Colitis 2012; 6: 991–1030. - PubMed
-
- Feagan BG, Macdonald JK. Oral 5-aminosalicyclic acid for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 10: CD000543–CD000543. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
