'The industry must be inconspicuous': Japan Tobacco's corruption of science and health policy via the Smoking Research Foundation
- PMID: 29437992
- PMCID: PMC6073917
- DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053971
'The industry must be inconspicuous': Japan Tobacco's corruption of science and health policy via the Smoking Research Foundation
Abstract
Objective: To investigate how and why Japan Tobacco, Inc. (JT) in 1986 established the Smoking Research Foundation (SRF), a research-funding institution, and to explore the extent to which SRF has influenced science and health policy in Japan.
Methods: We analysed documents in the Truth Tobacco Industry Documents archive, along with recent Japanese litigation documents and published documents.
Results: JT's effort to combat effective tobacco control was strengthened in the mid-1980s, following privatisation of the company. While remaining under the protection of Japan's Ministry of Finance, the semiprivatised company lost its 'access to politicos', opening up a perceived need for collaboration with global cigarette makers. One solution, arrived at through clandestine planning with American companies, was to establish a third-party organisation, SRF, with the hope of capturing scientific and medical authority for the industry. Guarded by powerful people in government and academia, SRF was launched with the covert goal of influencing tobacco policy both inside and outside Japan. Scholars funded by SRF have participated in international conferences, national advisory committees and tobacco litigation, in most instances helping the industry to maintain a favourable climate for the continued sale of cigarettes.
Conclusions: Contrary to industry claims, SRF was never meant to be independent or neutral. With active support from foreign cigarette manufacturers, SRF represents the expansion into Asia of the denialist campaign that began in the USA in 1953.
Keywords: globalisation; litigation; secondhand smoke; tobacco industry documents.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: RNP often serves as an expert witness in litigation against the cigarette industry.
Comment in
-
A think tank of JT, by JT and for JT.Tob Control. 2018 Jul;27(e1):e1-e2. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054148. Epub 2018 Feb 4. Tob Control. 2018. PMID: 29437991 No abstract available.
References
-
- Levin MA. Puffing precedents: The impact of the WHO FCTC on tobacco product liability litigation in Japan. Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy 2016;1:19–48.
-
- Thun MJ. More misleading science from the tobacco industry. BMJ 2003;327:E237–E238. 10.1136/bmjusa.03070002 - DOI
-
- Japan Tobacco Inc. Kankyō-chū tabakoen [environmental tobacco smoke]. https://www.jti.co.jp/corporate/enterprise/tobacco/responsibilities/resp... (accessed 20 Sep 2017).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous