Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 13;13(2):e0190695.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190695. eCollection 2018.

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries

Affiliations

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries

Katherine Davis et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Core outcome sets (COS) comprise a minimum set of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all trials for a specific health condition. The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative maintains an up to date, publicly accessible online database of published and ongoing COS. An annual systematic review update is an important part of this process.

Methods: This review employed the same, multifaceted approach that was used in the original review and the previous two updates. This approach has identified studies that sought to determine which outcomes/domains to measure in clinical trials of a specific condition. This update includes an analysis of the inclusion of participants from low and middle income countries (LMICs) as identified by the OECD, in these COS.

Results: Eighteen publications, relating to 15 new studies describing the development of 15 COS, were eligible for inclusion in the review. Results show an increase in the use of mixed methods, including Delphi surveys. Clinical experts remain the most common stakeholder group involved. Overall, only 16% of the 259 COS studies published up to the end of 2016 have included participants from LMICs.

Conclusion: This review highlights opportunities for greater public participation in COS development and the involvement of stakeholders from a wider range of geographical settings, in particular LMICs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: DGA, JMB, MC, ST and PRW are members of the COMET Management Group and coapplicants on grants to support COMET and related work. KD and EG are the COMET Project Co-ordinators. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Identification of studies.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Year of first publication of each COS study (n = 259).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Number of COS studies that have included participants from each individual country throughout the world.

References

    1. Sox HC, Greenfield S. Comparative effectiveness research: a report from the Institute of Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(3):203–205. - PubMed
    1. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E, et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials. 2012;13:132 doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-132 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waster in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374(9683):86–89. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Macleod MR, Michie S, Roberts I, Dirnagl U, Chalmers I, Ioannidis JP, et al. Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):101–4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62329-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirkham JJ, Boers M, Tugwell P, Clarke M, Williamson PR. Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years. Trials. 2013;14:324 doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-324 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources