Geographic access to mammography facilities and frequency of mammography screening
- PMID: 29439783
- PMCID: PMC5819606
- DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.11.012
Geographic access to mammography facilities and frequency of mammography screening
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the association between geographic access to mammography facilities and women's mammography utilization frequency.
Methods: Using data from the population-based 1995-2007 Wisconsin Women's Health study, we used proportional odds and logistic regression to test whether driving times to mammography facilities and the number of mammography facilities within 10 km of women's homes were associated with mammography frequency among women aged 50-74 years and whether associations differed between Rural-Urban Commuting Areas and income and education groups.
Results: We found evidence for nonlinear relationships between geographic access and mammography utilization (nonlinear effects of driving times and facility density, P-values .01 and .005, respectively). Having at least one nearby mammography facility was associated with greater mammography frequency among urban women (1 vs. 0 facilities, odds ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.47), with similar effects among rural women. Adding more facilities had decreasing marginal effects. Long driving times tended to be associated with lower mammography frequency. We found no effect modification by income, education, or urbanicity. In rural settings, mammography nonuse was higher, facility density smaller, and driving times to facilities were longer.
Conclusions: Having at least one mammography facility near one's home may increase mammography utilization, with decreasing effects per each additional facility.
Keywords: Health services accessibility; Mammography; Spatial epidemiology.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Time and distance barriers to mammography facilities in the Atlanta metropolitan area.J Community Health. 2011 Aug;36(4):675-83. doi: 10.1007/s10900-011-9359-5. J Community Health. 2011. PMID: 21267639 Free PMC article.
-
Breast cancer stage at diagnosis and geographic access to mammography screening (New Hampshire, 1998-2004).Rural Remote Health. 2010 Apr-Jun;10(2):1361. Epub 2010 Apr 23. Rural Remote Health. 2010. PMID: 20438282 Free PMC article.
-
Association between individual and geographic factors and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Aug;23(8):664-74. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4668. Epub 2014 May 27. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014. PMID: 24865409 Free PMC article.
-
Rural-urban difference in female breast cancer diagnosis in Missouri.Rural Remote Health. 2015 Jul-Sep;15(3):3063. Epub 2015 Jul 29. Rural Remote Health. 2015. PMID: 26223824
-
Travel Times for Screening Mammography: Impact of Geographic Expansion by a Large Academic Health System.Acad Radiol. 2017 Sep;24(9):1125-1131. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 May 5. Acad Radiol. 2017. PMID: 28483308
Cited by
-
Changes in geographic accessibility to mammography by state and rural-urban status, United States, 2006-2022.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Mar 9;115(3):337-340. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac217. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023. PMID: 36515214 Free PMC article.
-
Elimination of Defects in Mammograms Caused by a Malfunction of the Device Matrix.J Imaging. 2022 May 2;8(5):128. doi: 10.3390/jimaging8050128. J Imaging. 2022. PMID: 35621892 Free PMC article.
-
Socioeconomic and Racial Inequities in Breast Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Washington State.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110946. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10946. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34028552 Free PMC article.
-
A catchment and location-allocation analysis of mammography access in Delaware, US: implications for disparities in geographic access to breast cancer screening.Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Nov 8;25(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01738-w. Breast Cancer Res. 2023. PMID: 37941020 Free PMC article.
-
A Catchment and Location-Allocation Analysis of Mammography Access in Delaware, US: Implications for disparities in geographic access to breast cancer screening.Res Sq [Preprint]. 2023 Feb 28:rs.3.rs-2600236. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2600236/v1. Res Sq. 2023. Update in: Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Nov 8;25(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01738-w. PMID: 36909545 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
References
-
- Moss SM, Cuckle H, Evans A, Johns L, Waller M, Bobrow L. Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years’ follow-up: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;368(9552):2053–2060. - PubMed
-
- Miller AB, To T, Baines CJ, Wall C. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: breast cancer mortality after 11 to 16 years of follow-up: a randomized screening trial of mammography in women age 40 to 49 years. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002;137(5 Part 1):305–312. - PubMed
-
- Nyström L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjöld B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 2002;359(9310):909–919. - PubMed
-
- Greenwald P, Sondik EJ. Cancer control objectives for the nation, 1985–2000. 1986
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical