Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;28(2):65-71.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Dec 7.

Geographic access to mammography facilities and frequency of mammography screening

Affiliations

Geographic access to mammography facilities and frequency of mammography screening

Patricia I Jewett et al. Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the association between geographic access to mammography facilities and women's mammography utilization frequency.

Methods: Using data from the population-based 1995-2007 Wisconsin Women's Health study, we used proportional odds and logistic regression to test whether driving times to mammography facilities and the number of mammography facilities within 10 km of women's homes were associated with mammography frequency among women aged 50-74 years and whether associations differed between Rural-Urban Commuting Areas and income and education groups.

Results: We found evidence for nonlinear relationships between geographic access and mammography utilization (nonlinear effects of driving times and facility density, P-values .01 and .005, respectively). Having at least one nearby mammography facility was associated with greater mammography frequency among urban women (1 vs. 0 facilities, odds ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.47), with similar effects among rural women. Adding more facilities had decreasing marginal effects. Long driving times tended to be associated with lower mammography frequency. We found no effect modification by income, education, or urbanicity. In rural settings, mammography nonuse was higher, facility density smaller, and driving times to facilities were longer.

Conclusions: Having at least one mammography facility near one's home may increase mammography utilization, with decreasing effects per each additional facility.

Keywords: Health services accessibility; Mammography; Spatial epidemiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Directed Acyclic Graph of the associations between driving time and mammography facility density within residential neighborhood, and frequency of mammography screening use
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated spatial pattern of average annual mammography utilization in Wisconsin relative to location of mammography facilities (black points) (N=5,930), Wisconsin Women’s Health Study, 1995–2007

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Esserman LJ, Thompson IM, Reid B, et al. Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: a prescription for change. The Lancet Oncology. 2014;15(6):e234–e242. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moss SM, Cuckle H, Evans A, Johns L, Waller M, Bobrow L. Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years’ follow-up: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;368(9552):2053–2060. - PubMed
    1. Miller AB, To T, Baines CJ, Wall C. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: breast cancer mortality after 11 to 16 years of follow-up: a randomized screening trial of mammography in women age 40 to 49 years. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002;137(5 Part 1):305–312. - PubMed
    1. Nyström L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjöld B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 2002;359(9310):909–919. - PubMed
    1. Greenwald P, Sondik EJ. Cancer control objectives for the nation, 1985–2000. 1986

Publication types

MeSH terms