Assay variation in the detection of antinuclear antibodies in the sera of patients with established SLE
- PMID: 29440000
- DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212599
Assay variation in the detection of antinuclear antibodies in the sera of patients with established SLE
Abstract
Objective: The expression of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) is considered almost constant in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), although recent experience has suggested that many subjects with SLE considered for clinical trials are ANA negative at screening. The objective of this study is to determine whether assay variation can influence ANA detection in patients with established SLE.
Methods: Sera from 103 patients with established SLE were tested using three different immunofluorescence assays (IFA) for ANA determination. ANA determinations were also performed by an ELISA and bead-based multiplex assay.
Results: With IFA kits, the frequency of ANA negativity varied from 5 to 23 of 103 samples (4.9%-22.3%). The ELISA and multiplex assays showed that 12 (11.7%) and 14 (13.6%) samples were negative, respectively. Samples positive in all assays differed from those with discordant assay results in the frequency of historical anti-double-stranded DNA positivity and low complement levels at the time of blood sampling.
Discussion: These findings indicate that ANA negativity occurs in patients with established SLE although the frequency varies depending on the assay kit. Given the range of negativity with well-validated assays, these findings raise questions about whether ANA positivity should be employed to determine eligibility for clinical trials.
Keywords: autoantibodies; autoimmune diseases; systemic lupus erythematosus.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Comment in
-
Lack of standardisation of ANA and implications for drug development and precision medicine.Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 May;78(5):e33. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213374. Epub 2018 Mar 24. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019. PMID: 29574414 No abstract available.
-
Response to: 'Lack of standardization of ANA and implications for drug development and precision medicine' by Mahler.Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 May;78(5):e34. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213399. Epub 2018 Mar 28. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019. PMID: 29592916 No abstract available.
-
Unending story of the indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells: old problems and new solutions?Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;78(6):e46. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213440. Epub 2018 Apr 17. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019. PMID: 29666046 No abstract available.
-
Variation in antinuclear antibody detection by automated indirect immunofluorescence analysis.Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;78(6):e48. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213543. Epub 2018 Apr 20. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019. PMID: 29678938 No abstract available.
-
Pitfalls of antinuclear antibody detection in systemic lupus erythematosus: the positive experience of a national multicentre study.Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;78(6):e50. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213516. Epub 2018 Apr 25. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019. PMID: 29695499 No abstract available.
-
Response to: 'Unending story of the indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells: old problems and new solutions?' by Meroni et al.Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;78(6):e47. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213537. Epub 2018 Apr 28. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019. PMID: 29705742 No abstract available.
-
Response to: 'Variation in antinuclear antibody detection by automated indirect immunofluorescence analysis' by van Hoovels et al.Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;78(6):e49. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213558. Epub 2018 May 5. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019. PMID: 29730638 No abstract available.
-
Response to: 'Pitfalls of antinuclear antibody detection in systemic lupus erythematosus: the positive experience of a national multi-center study' by Pregnalato et al.Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;78(6):e51. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213582. Epub 2018 May 5. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019. PMID: 29730639 No abstract available.
-
Antinuclear antibody as entry criterion for classification of systemic lupus erythematosus: pitfalls and opportunities.Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Aug;78(8):e76. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213821. Epub 2018 Jun 23. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019. PMID: 29936439 No abstract available.
-
Response to: 'Antinuclear antibody as entry criterion for classification of systemic lupus erythematosus: pitfalls and opportunities' by Bossuyt et al.Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Aug;78(8):e77. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213841. Epub 2018 Jun 23. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019. PMID: 29936440 No abstract available.
-
Variation in antinuclear antibody detection: need for clear expectations and additional studies.Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Oct;78(10):e118. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213888. Epub 2018 Jun 29. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019. PMID: 29960978 No abstract available.
-
How Should We Consider Lupus Without Antinuclear Antibodies?Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Jul;71(7):853-854. doi: 10.1002/acr.23714. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019. PMID: 30035362 No abstract available.
-
Response to: 'ANA testing in "real life"' by Infantino etal.Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jan;79(1):e4. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214650. Epub 2018 Nov 17. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020. PMID: 30448767 No abstract available.
-
ANA testing in 'real life'.Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jan;79(1):e3. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214615. Epub 2018 Nov 17. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020. PMID: 30448768 No abstract available.
-
Response to: "Antinuclear autoantibodies: discordance among four different assays" by Pacheco et al.Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jan;79(1):e7. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214766. Epub 2018 Dec 1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020. PMID: 30504443 No abstract available.
-
Harmonisation of laboratory tests for rheumatic diseases: still a long way to go.Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jan;79(1):e5. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214696. Epub 2018 Dec 4. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020. PMID: 30514700 No abstract available.
-
Can solid-phase assays replace immunofluorescence for ANA screening?Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Mar;79(3):e32. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214805. Epub 2018 Dec 8. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020. PMID: 30530824 No abstract available.
-
Response to: 'Can solid-phase assays replace immunofluorescence for ANA screening?' by Bizzaro.Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Mar;79(3):e33. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214829. Epub 2019 Jan 18. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020. PMID: 30659048 No abstract available.
-
Response to 'Antinuclear antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence and solid phase assays' by Bossuyt et al.Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):e66. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215479. Epub 2019 May 10. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020. PMID: 31076389 No abstract available.
-
Antinuclear antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence and solid phase assays.Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):e65. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215443. Epub 2019 May 10. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020. PMID: 31076390 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
