Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 12;8(2):e018815.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018815.

Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care

Affiliations

Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care

Jordan Abdi et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: With an elderly population that is set to more than double by 2050 worldwide, there will be an increased demand for elderly care. This poses several impediments in the delivery of high-quality health and social care. Socially assistive robot (SAR) technology could assume new roles in health and social care to meet this higher demand. This review qualitatively examines the literature on the use of SAR in elderly care and aims to establish the roles this technology may play in the future.

Design: Scoping review.

Data sources: Search of CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, PsychINFO and Scopus databases was conducted, complemented with a free search using Google Scholar and reference harvesting. All publications went through a selection process, which involved sequentially reviewing the title, abstract and full text of the publication. No limitations regarding date of publication were imposed, and only English publications were taken into account. The main search was conducted in March 2016, and the latest search was conducted in September 2017.

Eligibility criteria: The inclusion criteria consist of elderly participants, any elderly healthcare facility, humanoid and pet robots and all social interaction types with the robot. Exclusions were acceptability studies, technical reports of robots and publications surrounding physically or surgically assistive robots.

Results: In total, 61 final publications were included in the review, describing 33 studies and including 1574 participants and 11 robots. 28 of the 33 papers report positive findings. Five roles of SAR were identified: affective therapy, cognitive training, social facilitator, companionship and physiological therapy.

Conclusions: Although many positive outcomes were reported, a large proportion of the studies have methodological issues, which limit the utility of the results. Nonetheless, the reported value of SAR in elderly care does warrant further investigation. Future studies should endeavour to validate the roles demonstrated in this review.

Systematic review registration: NIHR 58672.

Keywords: elderly; geriatric medicine; robots; social medicine; socially assistive robots.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic flow diagram of the review process.

References

    1. United Nations. World Population Prospects. 2015;1 http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2015_Volume-I_Comprehen...
    1. Thomas J. Insights into Loneliness, Older People and Well-being. 2015:1–10 http://backup.ons.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2015/10/Insights-int....
    1. Victor C, Scambler S, Bond J, et al. . social isolation and living alone in later life. Rev Clin Gerontol 2000;10:407–17.
    1. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med 2010;7:7 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hegel F, Muhl C, Wrede B, et al. . Understanding Social Robots. Second Int Conf Adv Comput Interact 2009:(Section II):169–74. 10.1109/ACHI.2009.51 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources