Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jan 30:9:25.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00025. eCollection 2018.

Beyond Chemical Triggers: Evidence for Sound-Evoked Physiological Reactions in Plants

Affiliations
Review

Beyond Chemical Triggers: Evidence for Sound-Evoked Physiological Reactions in Plants

Jihye Jung et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

Sound is ubiquitous in nature. Recent evidence supports the notion that naturally occurring and artificially generated sound waves contribute to plant robustness. New information is emerging about the responses of plants to sound and the associated downstream signaling pathways. Here, beyond chemical triggers which can improve plant health by enhancing plant growth and resistance, we provide an overview of the latest findings, limitations, and potential applications of sound wave treatment as a physical trigger to modulate physiological traits and to confer an adaptive advantage in plants. We believe that sound wave treatment is a new trigger to help protect plants against unfavorable conditions and to maintain plant fitness.

Keywords: physical trigger; plant protectant; plant stimulant; ripening delaying; sound vibration; transcriptome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Sound production and perception in plants. (A) Sound production. Plants produce sound vibrations in their xylem via the generation of tension in the xylem vessel when its diameter decreases (Hölttä et al., 2005). Additionally, gas bubbles produced in xylem vessels during transpiration may produce sound (Laschimke et al., 2006). (B) Sound Perception. Although there are no visible alterations, transcriptional and translational changes occur in plants exposed to sound vibrations. Levels of mechano-stimulus responsive, signaling-related, redox homeostasis, and defense-related transcripts are changed in sound-exposed plants (Ghosh et al., 2016). However, the specific organs or proteins used for sound perception have not yet been identified.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Sound waves as a plant stimulant and protectant. Artificial sound treatment can elicit various effects in plants. First, enhancement of seed germination and plant growth. Sound promotes plant growth by regulating the plant growth hormones indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and gibberellin (Bochu et al., 2004; Ghosh et al., 2016). Second, induction of plant defense responses against pathogens. Sound pretreatment enhances plant immunity against subsequent pathogen attacks by activating the plant defense hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) (Hassanien et al., 2014; Ghosh et al., 2016). Third, induction of abiotic stress tolerance. For instance, sound treatment triggers drought tolerance by changing the elasticity and flexibility of the cell wall, which affects the ability of plants to absorb water (Jeong et al., 2014). Fourth, perturbation of ripening. Sound treatment disrupts the ripening of tomato fruit. Ethylene production is delayed by down-regulation of ethylene biosynthesis and expression of signaling-related genes (Kim et al., 2015). Fifth, enhancement of the photosynthetic capacity. Sound treatment increases expression of photosynthesis-related genes, such as those encoding fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase and the rubisco small sub-unit, and may induce CO2 fixation (Jeong et al., 2008; Uematsu et al., 2012).

References

    1. Aggio R. B. M., Obolonkin V., Villas-Bôas S. G. (2012). Sonic vibration affects the metabolism of yeast cells growing in liquid culture: a metabolomic study. Metabolomics 8 670–678. 10.1007/s11306-011-0360-x - DOI
    1. Appel H. M., Cocroft R. B. (2014). Plants respond to leaf vibrations caused by insect herbivore chewing. Oecologia 175 1257–1266. 10.1007/s00442-014-2995-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bochu W., Jiping S., Biao L., Jie L., Chuanren D. (2004). Soundwave stimulation triggers the content change of the endogenous hormone of the Chrysanthemum mature callus. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 37 107–112. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2004.03.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bochu W., Yoshikoshi A., Sakanishi A. (1998). Carrot cell growth response in a stimulated ultrasonic environment. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 12 89–95. 10.1016/S0927-7765(98)00061-7 - DOI
    1. Borghetti M., Raschi A., Grace J. (1989). Ultrasound emission after cycles of water stress in Picea abies. Tree Physiol. 5 229–237. 10.1093/treephys/5.2.229 - DOI - PubMed