Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 14;8(1):3036.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20832-0.

Validating a breast cancer score in Spanish women. The MCC-Spain study

Affiliations

Validating a breast cancer score in Spanish women. The MCC-Spain study

Trinidad Dierssen-Sotos et al. Sci Rep. .

Erratum in

  • Author Correction: Validating a breast cancer score in Spanish women. The MCC-Spain study.
    Dierssen-Sotos T, Gómez-Acebo I, Palazuelos C, Fernández-Navarro P, Altzibar JM, González-Donquiles C, Ardanaz E, Bustamante M, Alonso-Molero J, Vidal C, Bayo-Calero J, Tardón A, Salas D, Marcos-Gragera R, Moreno V, Rodriguez-Cundin P, Castaño-Vinyals G, Ederra M, Vilorio-Marqués L, Amiano P, Pérez-Gómez B, Aragonés N, Kogevinas M, Pollán M, Llorca J. Dierssen-Sotos T, et al. Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 1;10(1):5980. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62511-z. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32238823 Free PMC article.

Abstract

A breast-risk score, published in 2016, was developed in white-American women using 92 genetic variants (GRS92), modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors. With the aim of validating the score in the Spanish population, 1,732 breast cancer cases and 1,910 controls were studied. The GRS92, modifiable and non-modifiable risk factor scores were estimated via logistic regression. SNPs without available genotyping were simulated as in the aforementioned 2016 study. The full model score was obtained by combining GRS92, modifiable and non-modifiable risk factor scores. Score performances were tested via the area under the ROC curve (AUROC), net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Compared with non-modifiable and modifiable factor scores, GRS92 had higher discrimination power (AUROC: 0.6195, 0.5885 and 0.5214, respectively). Adding the non-modifiable factor score to GRS92 improved patient classification by 23.6% (NRI = 0.236), while the modifiable factor score only improved it by 7.2%. The full model AUROC reached 0.6244. A simulation study showed the ability of the full model for identifying women at high risk for breast cancer. In conclusion, a model combining genetic and risk factors can be used for stratifying women by their breast cancer risk, which can be applied to individualizing genetic counseling and screening recommendations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kernel density plots on distribution of genetic and risk factor scores in breast cancer cases (red line) and controls (blue line).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Projected breast-cancer incidence rate by age, according to the percentiles of the scores. (A) Genetic score; (B) Non-modifiable risk factors; (C) Modifiable risk factors; (D) Full model. In each graphic, lines from bottom to top represent percentiles 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 90, 95 and 99.

References

    1. Ferlay J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359–E386. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Golubnitschaja O, et al. Breast cancer epidemic in the early twenty-first century: evaluation of risk factors, cumulative questionnaires and recommendations for preventive measures. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(10):12941–12957. doi: 10.1007/s13277-016-5168-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lambertini M, et al. Reproductive behaviors and risk of developing breast cancer according to tumor subtype: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2016;49:65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.07.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hankinson S., Tamimi R., Hunter D. Breast Cancer in Textbook of CancerEpidemiology (eds Adami HO., Hunter D., Trichopoulos D.) 403–445 (Oxford University Press, 2008).
    1. Walker LC, et al. Evaluation of copy-number variants as modifiers of breast and ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2017;25:432–438. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.203. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types