Bone graft materials for posterolateral fusion made simple: a systematic review
- PMID: 29445947
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5511-6
Bone graft materials for posterolateral fusion made simple: a systematic review
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Bone graft materials for posterolateral fusion made simple: a systematic review.Eur Spine J. 2021 Aug;30(8):2410-2411. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06900-6. Eur Spine J. 2021. PMID: 34235575 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Iliac crest has long been the gold standard for lumbar fusion, but concerns over donor site morbidity have led to a wide variety of bone graft substitutes. Despite prolific research, a general consensus is yet to be reached on bone graft materials that lead to optimal fusion.
Purpose: The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current literature for bone graft material options that maximize fusion rate in posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery.
Design: Systematic Review.
Methods: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science was conducted. Included studies were published from January 2000 to July 2015, were clinical human research studies involving available autograft, allograft, or synthetic bone graft options in posterolateral lumbar spine fusion, and reported radiographic fusion rate as a primary end outcome. This research had no funding source and the authors have no conflicts to declare.
Results: 81 articles underwent full-text review, and 48 were included in this study. 18 studies assessed fusion rate by plain radiographs alone (37.5%), while 6 used CT scan (12.5%), and 24 used both (50.0%). 45 studies looked at ICBG in conjunction with LAG (29), BCP(1), APC (2), BMPs (6), or DBM (1). Aggregate mean fusion rates among these ranged from 68.0 to 91.5%. 22 studies evaluated fusion rates of LAG, either isolated (3) or combined with ceramic extenders (8), DBM (4), BMP (1), BMA (4), APC (1), or ICBG(1). Aggregate mean fusion rate ranged from 75 to 95.5%. With the exception of studies involving allograft (mean fusion rate 40.0%), the mean fusion rate for all other graft combinations exceeded 70.0%.
Conclusions: While our results find that LAG+BMA provided highest fusion rate, most material options analyzed in this study provide comparable fusion outcomes. The ideal graft option must incorporate a combination of materials with osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic properties. Our results represent the robust and dynamic nature of the current state of lumbar graft technology. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Keywords: Allograft; Autograft; Bone graft; Bone marrow; Ceramics; Collagen; Graft materials; Growth factors; Posterolateral lumbar fusion.
Similar articles
-
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of concentrated bone marrow aspirate with allograft and demineralized bone matrix for posterolateral and interbody lumbar fusion in elderly patients.Eur Spine J. 2015 Nov;24(11):2567-72. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4117-5. Epub 2015 Jul 14. Eur Spine J. 2015. PMID: 26169879
-
Graft options in posterolateral and posterior interbody lumbar fusion.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 1;35(17):1629-39. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d25803. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010. PMID: 20628336 Review.
-
Influence of 45S5 Bioactive Glass in A Standard Calcium Phosphate Collagen Bone Graft Substitute on the Posterolateral Fusion of Rabbit Spine.Iowa Orthop J. 2017;37:193-198. Iowa Orthop J. 2017. PMID: 28852357 Free PMC article.
-
The use of coralline hydroxyapatite with bone marrow, autogenous bone graft, or osteoinductive bone protein extract for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Feb 15;24(4):320-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199902150-00003. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999. PMID: 10065514
-
Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 16: bone graft extenders and substitutes as an adjunct for lumbar fusion.J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jul;21(1):106-32. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14325. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014. PMID: 24980593 Review.
Cited by
-
What Is the Evidence Surrounding the Cost-Effectiveness of Osteobiologic Use in ACDF Surgery? A Systematic Review of the Literature.Global Spine J. 2024 Feb;14(2_suppl):163S-172S. doi: 10.1177/21925682221148139. Epub 2023 Jan 2. Global Spine J. 2024. PMID: 36592140 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Poly(ε-Caprolactone)/Sodium Bicarbonate/β-Tricalcium Phosphate Composites: Surface Characterization and Early Biological Response.Materials (Basel). 2025 Jun 3;18(11):2600. doi: 10.3390/ma18112600. Materials (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40508598 Free PMC article.
-
Osteogenic Differentiation of Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells Seeded on Equine-Derived Xenograft in Osteogenic Growth Media.Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 25;58(11):1518. doi: 10.3390/medicina58111518. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022. PMID: 36363474 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Therapeutic Pathogen Recognition Receptor Ligands for Osteo-Immunomodulation.Materials (Basel). 2021 Feb 27;14(5):1119. doi: 10.3390/ma14051119. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33673651 Free PMC article.
-
Critically Low Confidence in the Results Produced by Spine Surgery Systematic Reviews: An AMSTAR-2 Evaluation From 4 Spine Journals.Global Spine J. 2020 Aug;10(5):667-673. doi: 10.1177/2192568220917926. Epub 2020 Apr 13. Global Spine J. 2020. PMID: 32677574 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Djurasovic M et al (2009) RhBMP-2 versus iliac crest bone graft for lumbar spine fusion in patients over 60 years of age: a cost-utility study. Spine 34(3):238–243. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ffabe - DOI - PubMed
-
- Korovessis P, Koureas G, Zacharatos S, Papazisis Z, Lambiris E (2005) Correlative radiological, self-assessment and clinical analysis of evolution in instrumented dorsal and lateral fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease. Autograft versus coralline hydroxyapatite. Eur Spine J 14(7):630–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0855-5 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Lee K-B, Taghavi CE, Hsu MS et al (2010) The efficacy of rhBMP-2 versus autograft for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion in elderly patients. Eur Spine J 19(6):924–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1248-6 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Vaccaro AR, Stubbs HA, Block JE (2007) Demineralized bone matrix composite grafting for posterolateral spinal fusion. Orthopedics 30(7):567–570 - PubMed
-
- Sassard WR, Eidman DK, Gray PM et al (2000) Augmenting local bone with Grafton demineralized bone matrix for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion: avoiding second site autologous bone harvest. Orthopedics 23(10):1059–1064 (discussion 1064–1065) - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical