Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 1:185:142-148.
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.12.018. Epub 2018 Feb 10.

Acceptance and patterns of personal vaporizer use in Australia and the United Kingdom: Results from the International Tobacco Control survey

Affiliations

Acceptance and patterns of personal vaporizer use in Australia and the United Kingdom: Results from the International Tobacco Control survey

Cheolmin Lee et al. Drug Alcohol Depend. .

Abstract

Background: This study examined the prevalence and correlates of (1) perceived social acceptability of personal vaporizer (PV)/e-cigarette use, and (2) reported vaping in public and private places, in the UK and Australia with different regulatory environments for PVs.

Methods: Data analyzed come from 2849 smokers and recent ex-smokers in the UK and Australia who participated in the 2014 wave of the International Tobacco Control Survey.

Results: UK respondents were more likely to think vaping is socially acceptable than Australians (56.4% vs. 27.9%; p < 0.001). Having quit smoking, observing vaping in smoke-free (SF) public places, and believing vaping is less harmful than smoking was all significantly associated with greater perceived social acceptability of vaping in both countries. However, vaping status and that of friends and family were more influential in Australia than in the UK. Vaping was reported as much more common in private, than public, settings in both countries. UK vapers were more likely to report vaping in SF public places (OR = 2.66; 95% CI = 1.5-4.7; p < 0.01) and at home (OR = 2.44; 95% CI = 1.5-3.9; p < 0.001), but not in their car when controlling for demographic factors and vaping and smoking status.

Conclusion: The acceptability of vaping was greater among those who were more exposed to vaping and not just among those with some personal experience of vaping, suggesting no strong social barriers to increased use. Vaping in SF public places was less common than in homes, and both were more common in the UK than in Australia, suggesting some social constraints on use, particularly in Australia.

Keywords: Electronic cigarette; Personal vaporizers; Smoke-free places; Social norms; Survey research; Vaping.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

No conflict declared

References

    1. ABS. National Health Survey: First Results, 2014–15. 2015 Retrieved 06 December 2017, from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/4364.0.55.00....
    1. Action on Smoking and Health. Electronic cigarettes (also known as vapourisers) 2016 Retrieved Jan 08, 2016, from http://www.ash.org.uk/files/documents/ASH_715.pdf.
    1. Adkison SE, O’Connor RJ, Bansal-Travers M, Hyland A, Borland R, Yong HH, Cummings KM, McNeill A, Thrasher JF, Hammond D, Fong GT. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: International Tobacco Control Four-Country Survey. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44:207–215. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.10.018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychol Health. 2011;26:1113–1127. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.613995. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borland R. Understanding hard to maintain behaviour change: A dual process approach. Melbourne: Wiley; 2014. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms