Second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC without actionable mutations: is immunotherapy the 'panacea' for all patients?
- PMID: 29448944
- PMCID: PMC5815183
- DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1011-0
Second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC without actionable mutations: is immunotherapy the 'panacea' for all patients?
Abstract
The therapeutic approach for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without actionable mutations has been revolutionized by the recent approval of new effective drugs with various mechanisms of action, including nintedanib, ramucirumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and afatinib. The recent network meta-analysis of Créquit et al. (BMC Medicine, 15:193, 2017) compared the effectiveness and tolerability of the second-line treatments for advanced NSCLC with wild-type or unknown status for EGFR. The authors found that immunotherapy might be more efficacious than the currently recommended treatments. However, their meta-analysis does not take into account the role of predictive biomarkers - this is indeed a crucial point in the decision-making process considering that only a fraction of advanced NSCLC patients might derive a long-term benefit from second-line immunotherapy. The identification of molecular biomarkers that can predict a response to immune checkpoints, angiogenesis, and EGFR inhibitors remains an important goal of clinical research in order to maximize the benefit of these agents and to aid clinicians in the decision-making process.Please see related article: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-017-0954-x.
Keywords: Afatinib; Atezolizumab; Docetaxel; Erlotinib; NSCLC; Nintedanib; Nivolumab; Pembrolizumab; Pemetrexed; Ramucirumab; Second-line therapy.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests
The author has participated in speakers bureaus from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Roche, Boehringer, Bristol Mayer Squibb, Merck Sharp, and Dohme.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
Comment on
-
Comparative efficacy and safety of second-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with wild-type or unknown status for epidermal growth factor receptor: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC Med. 2017 Oct 30;15(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0954-x. BMC Med. 2017. PMID: 29082855 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Reck M, Popat S, Reinmuth N, De Ruysscher D, Kerr KM, Peters S, on behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(Suppl 3):27–39. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu199. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Reck M, Kaiser R, Mellemgaard A, Douillard JY, Orlov S, Krzakowski M, et al. Docetaxel plus nintedanib versus docetaxel plus placebo in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (LUME-Lung 1): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(2):143–55. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70586-2. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Garon EB, Ciuleanu TE, Arrieta O, Prabhash K, Syrigos KN, Goksel T, et al. Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel for second-line treatment of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based therapy (REVEL): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9944):665–73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60845-X. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
