Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 28:2:2.
doi: 10.1186/s41077-016-0035-9. eCollection 2017.

Simulation and mental health outcomes: a scoping review

Affiliations

Simulation and mental health outcomes: a scoping review

Brett Williams et al. Adv Simul (Lond). .

Abstract

Background: A scoping review was conducted in order to map and determine the gaps in literature on the impact of simulation as an educational approach to improve mental health care outcomes. As it became apparent that no literature existed on this topic, the study aimed to examine the educational impact of simulation on mental health education.

Methods: An established five-stage scoping methodology was used: (1) identification of the research question, (2) identification of relevant studies, (3) study selection, (4) charting the data and (5) collation, summarising and reporting of results. CINAHL, ProQuest, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsychINFO databases were searched. These databases were deemed to represent a majority of the literature while accommodating for the particular search strategy used for this review. Websites that provide grey literature were also searched for articles of relevance.

Results: A total of 48 articles were included in this review, with a considerable portion of studies conducted in the USA and UK. Others were conducted in an array of locations including Australia, Canada, Iran and Taiwan. Of the included articles, seven groups of simulation methods (including standardised patients, virtual reality and manikins as patients) were evident, with standardised patients being most prominent.

Conclusions: Literature is lacking to evidence the benefit of simulation on mental health patient outcomes. However, the available literature suggests a variety of simulation-based education, and training methods are currently being used within mental healthcare education. The findings do suggest some methods of simulation, such as the use of standardised patients, are more commonly used in education and have been deemed as effective to assist in mental health education. As no article specifically examining the mental health outcomes of patients treated by health professionals taught by simulation was identified, the educational outcomes outlined in this paper may be used to inform further research, incorporating mental health patient outcomes.

Keywords: Health occupations; Manikin; Mental health; Patient simulation; Students.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Search strategy methodology

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Doolen J, et al. An evaluation of mental health simulation with standardized patients. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2014;11(1):55–62. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2013-0075. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gaba DM. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health care. 2004;13(suppl 1):i2–10. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.009878. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown J. Applications of simulation technology in psychiatric mental health nursing education. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2008;15(8):638–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2008.001281.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gorrindo T, et al. Web-based simulation in psychiatry residency training: a pilot study. Acad Psychiatry. 2011;35(4):232–7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.35.4.232. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thomson AB, et al. How we developed an emergency psychiatry training course for new residents using principles of high-fidelity simulation. Med Teach. 2013;35(10):797–800. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.803522. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources