Double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on analgesic efficacy of local anesthetics articaine and bupivacaine after impacted third molar extraction
- PMID: 29450738
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2386-1
Double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on analgesic efficacy of local anesthetics articaine and bupivacaine after impacted third molar extraction
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) was to compare the effect of bupivacaine and articaine at habitual doses on pain intensity and the need for analgesics after lower third molar extraction.
Materials and methods: The final study sample comprised 50 Caucasian volunteers (26 males and 24 females; age range, 18-30 years) undergoing scheduled surgical extraction of impacted lower third molar. A computer-generated random sequence was used to allocate participants to the articaine (4%) or bupivacaine (0.5%) group. Surgeons and patients were blinded by labeling the articaine and bupivacaine carpules with numbers (1 and 2, respectively). Postoperative pain intensity (primary outcome) was evaluated with a visual analogue scale (VAS), while the requirement for and timing of rescue medication and the quality of intraoperative anesthesia were also measured (secondary outcomes).
Results: VAS-measured pain intensity was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the articaine group than in the bupivacaine group at all time points except for 8 h post-surgery (p = 0.052). Rescue medication was required by 13 (52%) patients in the articaine group and 8 (32%) patients in the bupivacaine group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.252). The groups did not significantly differ (p = 0.391) in the quality of the intraoperative anesthesia.
Conclusions: Bupivacaine is a valid alternative to articaine in third molar surgery and may offer residual anesthesia as a means of reducing postoperative pain. However, further well-designed RCTs are required in larger study populations to verify the effectiveness of bupivacaine to achieve residual analgesia after oral surgery.
Clinical relevance: These findings suggest that bupivacaine may be useful as a coadjuvant to control acute postoperative pain.
Trial registration: ACTRN12617001138370.
Keywords: Acute pain; Articaine; Bupivacaine; Postoperative pain; Third molar surgery.
Similar articles
-
Bupivacaine 0.5% versus articaine 4% for the removal of lower third molars. A crossover randomized controlled trial.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 May 1;17(3):e462-8. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17628. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012. PMID: 22143739 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine (both with 1:200,000 epinephrine) for lower third molar removal.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Jul;106(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.11.024. Epub 2008 Apr 16. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008. PMID: 18420431 Clinical Trial.
-
Liposomal Bupivacaine Use in Third Molar Impaction Surgery: INNOVATE Study.Anesth Prog. 2017 Fall;64(3):127-135. doi: 10.2344/anpr-64-02-03. Anesth Prog. 2017. PMID: 28858553 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Anesthetic and analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine in mandibular third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quintessence Int. 2020;51(7):586-597. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a44633. Quintessence Int. 2020. PMID: 32500866
-
Safety and efficacy of 4% articaine in mandibular third-molar extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.J Am Dent Assoc. 2020 Dec;151(12):912-923.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.08.016. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020. PMID: 33228884
Cited by
-
Comparison of the effects of articaine and bupivacaine in impacted mandibular third molar tooth surgery: a randomized, controlled trial.J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Dec;21(6):575-582. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.6.575. Epub 2021 Nov 26. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2021. PMID: 34909475 Free PMC article.
-
Injectable and topical local anesthetics for acute dental pain: 2 systematic reviews.J Am Dent Assoc. 2023 Jan;154(1):53-64.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2022.10.014. J Am Dent Assoc. 2023. PMID: 36608963 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis.Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jan;25(1):1-22. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03675-w. Epub 2020 Nov 8. Clin Oral Investig. 2021. PMID: 33161499
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical