Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Feb;6(1):10.1128/microbiolspec.pfs-0019-2017.
doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.PFS-0019-2017.

Molecular Tools To Study Preharvest Food Safety Challenges

Affiliations
Review

Molecular Tools To Study Preharvest Food Safety Challenges

Deepak Kumar et al. Microbiol Spectr. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Preharvest food safety research and activities have advanced over time with the recognition of the importance and complicated nature of the preharvest phase of food production. In developed nations, implementation of preharvest food safety procedures along with strict monitoring and containment at various postharvest stages such as slaughter, processing, storage, and distribution have remarkably reduced the burden of foodborne pathogens in humans. Early detection and adequate surveillance of pathogens at the preharvest stage is of the utmost importance to ensure a safe meat supply. There is an urgent need to develop rapid, cost-effective, and point-of-care diagnostics which could be used at the preharvest stage and would complement postmortem and other quality checks performed at the postharvest stage. With newer methods and technologies, more efforts need to be directed toward developing rapid, sensitive, and specific methods for detection or screening of foodborne pathogens at the preharvest stage. In this review, we will discuss the molecular methods available for detection and molecular typing of bacterial foodborne pathogens at the farm. Such methods include conventional techniques such as endpoint PCR, real-time PCR, DNA microarray, and more advanced techniques such as matrix-assisted layer desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and whole-genome sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Blaha T. 1997. Public health and pork: pre-harvest food safety and slaughter perspectives. Rev Sci Tech 16:489–495. [PubMed] - PubMed
    1. Blaha TH. 1996. What’s coming in food safety and pork quality, p 136–138. Proceedings of the 23rd Allen D. Leman Conference, 21–24 September, St Paul, MN.
    1. Buntain B. 1997. The role of the food animal veterinarian in the HACCP era. J Am Vet Med Assoc 210:492–495. [PubMed] - PubMed
    1. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2015. Summary report on antimicrobials sold or distributed for use in food-producing animals. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/forindustry/userfees/animaldruguserfeeacta.... Accessed July 22, 2017.
    1. Turnidge J. 2004. Antibiotic use in animals: prejudices, perceptions and realities. J Antimicrob Chemother 53:26–27. [PubMed] - PubMed

MeSH terms