Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 1;33(4):494-504.
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy016.

Understanding communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process in Latin America: a cross-sectional study on the use of clinical correspondence in public healthcare networks of six countries

Affiliations

Understanding communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process in Latin America: a cross-sectional study on the use of clinical correspondence in public healthcare networks of six countries

Ingrid Vargas et al. Health Policy Plan. .

Abstract

An adequate use of referral and reply letters-the main form of communication between primary care (PC) and out-patient secondary care (SC)-helps to avoid medical errors, test duplications and delays in diagnosis. However, it has been little studied to date in Latin America. The aim is to determine the level and characteristics of PC and SC doctors' use of referral and reply letters and to explore influencing factors in public healthcare networks of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay. A cross-sectional study was conducted through a survey of PC and SC doctors working in public healthcare networks (348 doctors per country). The COORDENA questionnaire was applied to measure the frequency of use and receipt of referral and reply letters, quality of contents, timeliness and difficulties in using them. Descriptive analyses were conducted and a multivariate logistic regression model was generated to assess the relationship between frequent use and associated factors. The great majority of doctors claim that they send referral letters to the other level. However, only half of SC doctors (a higher proportion in Chile and Mexico) report that they receive referral letters and <20% of PC doctors receive a reply from specialists. Insufficient recording of data is reported in terms of medical history, tests and medication and the reason for referral. The factor associated with frequent use of the referral letter is doctors' age, while the use of reply letters is associated with identifying PC doctors as care coordinators, knowing them and trusting in their clinical skills, and receiving referral letters. Significant problems are revealed in the use of referral and reply letters which may affect quality of care. Multifaceted strategies are required that foster a direct contact between doctors and a better understanding of the PC-based model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequent use and receipt of referral and reply letters by primary and secondary care doctors. Results correspond to the categories always and very often.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Almeida PF, Giovanella L, Mendonca MH, Escorel S.. 2010. Challenges for healthcare coordination: strategies for integrating levels of care in large cities. Cadernos de Saude Publica 26: 286–98. - PubMed
    1. ANS. 2016. Dados Gerais. Taxa de Cobertura por Planos Privados de Saúde. Brasil (2006–2016). http://www.ans.gov.br/perfil-do-setor/dados-gerais, accessed 25 July 2016.
    1. Aronna A, Grande S, Herrmann J, Luppi I, Nestares G.. 2011. Cómo se construyen y utilizan registros en atención primaria de la salud. El caso de los centros de salud en la ciudad de Rosario In: Rovere M, Luppi I, Muruaga MC (eds). Evaluación de Tecnologías en Atención Primaria, 1st edn.Rosario (Argentina): Instituto de la Salut Juan Lazarte, 27–71.
    1. Atun R, de Andrade LO, Almeida G.. 2015. Health-system reform and universal health coverage in Latin America. Lancet 385: 1230–47. - PubMed
    1. Berendsen AJ, Benneker WH, Schuling J. et al. 2006. Collaboration with general practitioners: preferences of medical specialists—a qualitative study. BMC. Health Services Research 6: 155.. - PMC - PubMed