Perioperative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy with mini-laparotomy versus open hysterectomy for uterus weighing more than 250 g
- PMID: 29453729
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0792-7
Perioperative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy with mini-laparotomy versus open hysterectomy for uterus weighing more than 250 g
Abstract
To compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy and extraction of specimen via mini-laparotomy (RHML) versus open hysterectomy (OH) when uterus weighs more than 250 g. To study the factors determining the length of hospital stay in 2 groups. A retrospective analysis of all hysterectomies performed for uterus weighing more than 250 g from the year 2012 to 2015 was conducted. A total of 140 patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of surgery; RHML (n = 82) and OH (n = 58). Mini-laparotomy consisted of a customised incision connecting 2 left lateral port sites for specimen extraction after completing the hysterectomy robotically. Patient factors and perioperative outcomes were compared using Student's t tests and Chi-square analysis. Mean length of stay (RHML = 1.4 days; OH = 3.4 days), estimated blood loss (EBL) (RHML = 119.9 ml; OH = 547.5 ml) and operative time (RHML = 191.5 min; OH = 162.8 min) were significantly different. No significant differences were noted for patient BMI, age, comorbidities, intraoperative complications, pathology of uterus and uterus weight. Postoperative complications were significantly different between two groups (RHML = 6.0%; OH = 15.5%; p = .021). None of the patients stayed less than 24 h in OH group compared to 59.8% patients in RHML group. Type of procedure (p = .004) and EBL (p = .002) significantly predicted the length of stay. Patients undergoing RHML have significantly shorter length of stay, EBL and postoperative complications than OH. The operative time for RHML was longer than OH, but the overall decreased length of stay overcomes this disadvantage. RHML approach retains the benefits of da Vinci, while simultaneously preserving the specimen.
Keywords: Hysterectomy; Large uteri; Mini-laparotomy; Morcellation; Robotic surgery; Specimen removal.
Similar articles
-
Robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy for very large uteri.JSLS. 2013 Jul-Sep;17(3):400-6. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422521755. JSLS. 2013. PMID: 24018076 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights.J Robot Surg. 2017 Dec;11(4):433-439. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0674-4. Epub 2017 Jan 31. J Robot Surg. 2017. PMID: 28144809
-
Hysterectomy for Large Uterus by Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS).JSLS. 2024 Jul-Sep;28(3):e2024.00017. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00017. JSLS. 2024. PMID: 39445072 Free PMC article.
-
[Uterine volume and vaginal hysterectomy: Interest and limits of uterine morcellation].Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2016 Mar;44(3):175-80. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Mar 7. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2016. PMID: 26966037 Review. French.
-
Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for the larger uterus (>500 g): a case series and literature review.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Feb;295(2):397-405. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4237-0. Epub 2016 Nov 15. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017. PMID: 27848016 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical