Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Jul;98(1):47-51.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 14.

The sexual and reproductive health of foreign-born women in the United States

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The sexual and reproductive health of foreign-born women in the United States

Athena Tapales et al. Contraception. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To explore the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) behaviors, health insurance coverage and use of SRH services of women in the United States (U.S.) by nativity, disaggregated by race and ethnicity.

Study design: We analyzed publicly available and restricted data from the National Survey of Family Growth to assess differences and similarities between foreign-born and U.S.-born women, both overall and within Hispanic, non-Hispanic (NH) white, NH black and NH Asian groups.

Results: A larger proportion of foreign-born women than U.S.-born women lacked health insurance coverage. Foreign-born women utilized SRH services at lower rates than U.S.-born women; this effect diminished at the multivariate level, although race and ethnicity differences remained. Overall, foreign-born women were less likely to pay for SRH services with private insurance than U.S.-born women. Foreign-born women were less likely to use the most effective contraceptive methods than U.S.-born women, with some variation across race and ethnicity: NH white and NH black foreign-born women were less likely to use highly effective contraceptive methods than their U.S.-born counterparts, but among Hispanic women, the reverse was true.

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that the SRH behaviors, needs and outcomes of foreign-born women differ from those of U.S-born women within the same race/ethnic group.

Implications: This paper contributes to the emergent literature on immigrants in the U.S. by laying the foundation for further research on the SRH of the foreign-born population in the country, which is critical for developing public health policies and programs to understand better and serve this growing and diverse population.

Keywords: Foreign-born; Health insurance coverage; Immigrant; NSFG; Utilization of services.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pew Research Center. Modern immigration wave brings 59 million to U.S., driving population growth and change through 2065: views of immigration’s impact on U.S. society mixed. Washington, D.C: Pew Research Center; 2015.
    1. Greico EM, Acosta YD, de la Cruz GP, Gambino C, Gryn T, Larsen LJ, et al. The foreign-born population in the United States: 2010. U.S. Census Bureau; 2012.
    1. U.S. Census Bureau. [Accessed date: 15 December 2017];American community survey, 2012–2016 American community survey 5-year estimates, table B05002; generated by Hannah White-head; using American FactFinder. n.d https://factfinder.census.gov/
    1. Johnson PJ, Blewett LA, Davern M. Disparities in public use data availability for race, ethnic, and immigrant groups: national surveys for healthcare disparities research. Med Care. 2010;48:1122–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Islam NS, Khan S, Kwon S, Jang D, Ro M, Trinh-Shevrin C. Methodological issues in the collection, analysis, and reporting of granular data in Asian American populations: historical challenges and potential solutions. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010;21:1354–81. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources