Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul-Aug;21(4):270-275.
doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_382_16.

Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of a herbal mouthwash and chlorhexidine mouthwash on select periodontal pathogens: An in vitro and ex vivo study

Affiliations

Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of a herbal mouthwash and chlorhexidine mouthwash on select periodontal pathogens: An in vitro and ex vivo study

Multazim Muradkhan Pathan et al. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: Several herbal mouthwash and herbal extracts have been tested in vitro and in vivo in search of a suitable adjunct to mechanical therapy for long-term use. In this study, we aimed to look at the antimicrobial effect of the herbal mouthwash and chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash on select organisms in in vitro test and an ex vivo model.

Materials and methods: The antimicrobial effects were determined against standard strains of bacteria that are involved in different stages of periodontal diseases. The in vitro tests included determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) using broth dilution and agar diffusion. In the ex vivo part of the study supragingival dental plaque were obtained from 20 periodontally healthy adult volunteers. Descriptive analysis was done for the entire quantitative and qualitative variable recorded.

Results: The MIC by broth dilution method found no statistically significant difference between the mouthwashes. The agar dilution method showed CHX was more effective as compared to the herbal mouthwash against standard strains of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. However, no difference was observed between the mouthwashes for Porphyromonas, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Fusobacterium nucleatum. The ex vivo results conclude that none of the selected mouthwashes were statistically significantly different from each other.

Conclusion: In the present study, CHX showed higher levels of antimicrobial action than the herbal mouthwash against bacterial species. The results reinforce the earlier findings that the in vitro testing is sensitive to methods and due diligence is needed when extrapolating the data for further use. However, long-term use and in vivo effectiveness against the periopathogens need to be tested in well-planned clinical trials.

Keywords: Antimicrobial mouthwash; chlorhexidine; dental plaque; microbial sensitivity tests; oral bacteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of the effects of herbal mouthwash and chlorhexidine on a set of standard laboratory strains using broth dilution method
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of susceptible bacteria with herbal mouthwash and chlorhexidine by broth dilution method
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean colony-forming units of the bacteria with herbal mouthwash and chlorhexidine by in vitro agar dilution method
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean colony-forming units of the bacteria from dental plaque with herbal mouthwash and chlorhexidine by ex vivo method

References

    1. Albert-Kiszely A, Pjetursson BE, Salvi GE, Witt J, Hamilton A, Persson GR, et al. Comparison of the effects of cetylpyridinium chloride with an essential oil mouth rinse on dental plaque and gingivitis – A six-month randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34:658–67. - PubMed
    1. Netuschil L, Hoffmann T, Brecx M. How to select the right mouthrinses in periodontal prevention and therapy. Part I. Test systems and clinical investigations. Int J Dent Hyg. 2003;1:143–50. - PubMed
    1. Jones CG. Chlorhexidine: Is it still the gold standard? Periodontol 2000. 1997;15:55–62. - PubMed
    1. Pizzo G, Guiglia R, Imburgia M, Pizzo I, D’Angelo M, Giuliana G, et al. The effects of antimicrobial sprays and mouthrinses on supragingival plaque regrowth: A comparative study. J Periodontol. 2006;77:248–56. - PubMed
    1. Brecx M, Netuschil L, Hoffmann T. How to select the right mouthrinses in periodontal prevention and therapy. Part II. Clinical use and recommendations. Int J Dent Hyg. 2003;1:188–94. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources